Observational studyThe Journal of dermatology2025
Safety and effectiveness of secukinumab in Japanese patients with generalized pustular psoriasis: A post-marketing surveillance.
Observational study in The Journal of dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safety and effectiveness of secukinumab in Japanese patients with generalized pustular psoriasis: A post-marketing surveillance.The Journal of dermatology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Secukinumab is one of the human monoclonal antibodies recommended in the Japanese guidelines for patients with psoriasis, but few case reports and clinical studies on secukinumab for pustular psoriasis are available because of the rarity of the disease. This was an open-label, multicenter, uncontrolled, single-arm, prospective observational surveillance conducted in a clinical practice setting to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of secukinumab in Japanese patients with generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP). Patients were monitored for 1 year after starting secukinumab and followed up for an additional 2 years. Of 99 patients from 71 sites, 95 were included in safety and 82 in effectiveness analysis. The mean (standard deviation) observation period was 346.2 (64.87) days, and 91.58% of patients were observed over 52 weeks. Adverse events, serious adverse events, and adverse reactions were reported in 51.58%, 12.63%, and 35.79% of patients, respectively. Safety evaluations showed no significant difference in the incidence of events based on the history of biologics The proportion of patients with either "complete response" or "partial response" was ~90% from week 2 and remained stable until week 52. The proportion of patients with "remission (no symptom)" in the Japanese Dermatological Association total score increased from week 4 (22.22%) to week 52 (47.83%). The mean Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score decreased from week 1 (17.26) to week 16 (1.18), with the mean percentage change decreasing from -28.07% to -90.18%. The mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) total score decreased from 8.7 at the start of secukinumab treatment to 1.9 at week 52. At week 52, the proportion of patients with DLQI total score of 0/1 was 57.14%. No new safety signals for secukinumab in long-term treatment were observed from this surveillance, and no additional measures needed to be taken. Moreover, secukinumab showed sustained effectiveness in patients with GPP in Japan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.