Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40178137›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2025

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks for prevention of postoperative pain in women undergoing laparoscopic and robotic gynaecological surgery.

Sarah Alsamman, David M Haas, Insiyyah Patanwala, David A Klein, Kelly Kasper, Charlotte M Pickett

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah AlsammanUniversity of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California, USA.
David M HaasDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Insiyyah PatanwalaObstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, USA.
David A KleinUniversity of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California, USA.
Kelly KasperObstetrics and Gynecology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA.
Charlotte M PickettObstetrics and Gynecology, North Valley Kaiser Permanente Medical Group, Sacramento, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalePain control following laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery is key to successful recovery. The efficacy of the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block compared to no block or a local anaesthetic injection has not been well established in this population.

objectivesTo evaluate the benefits and harms of single-shot transversus abdominis plane blocks for the prevention of postoperative pain in women undergoing laparoscopic and robotic gynaecological surgery compared to no block, sham block, or injection of local anaesthetic. SEARCH

methodsWe searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, two trials registers, and handsearched abstracts to 6 December 2024. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included prospective randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of adult women undergoing minimally invasive gynaecologic surgery that compared single-shot TAP block to no block, sham block, or injection of local anaesthetic. We excluded studies that were non-randomised or of non-gynaecologic surgery. OUTCOMES: Critical and important outcomes: participant-reported pain intensity 24 hours following surgery (combined, at rest, and with movement), adverse events (serious adverse events, nausea and vomiting, postoperative sedation), opioid consumption 24 and 48 hours after surgery. Other outcomes: pain intensity 2, 6, 12, and 48 hours after surgery, opioid consumption intraoperatively, time from surgery to first participant requirement for postoperative opioid, time from surgery until discharge. RISK OF BIAS: We assessed the risk of bias with RoB 1. SYNTHESIS

methodsWe conducted meta-analyses using random-effects models. We calculated mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes. We reported serious adverse events as described by the study authors. We summarised the certainty of evidence using GRADE methods. INCLUDED STUDIES: We included 21 RCTs with a total of 1645 participants. Studies were conducted in 10 countries, and published between 2011 and 2023. Six studies compared TAP block to no block, eight compared TAP block to an injection of local anaesthetic, and seven studies compared TAP block to sham block. Studies reported pain outcomes in various ways, so we made assumptions to allow us to combine data. SYNTHESIS OF

results1. TAP block compared to no block TAP blocks may result in little or no difference in pain 24 hours after surgery for women undergoing laparoscopic or robotic gynaecologic procedures (MD -4.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) -11.06 to 1.74; 4 RCTs, 242 women; I AUTHORS'

conclusionsAmongst women undergoing minimally invasive gynaecologic surgery, we did not find a clinically meaningful effect of TAP block on postoperative pain or opioid consumption. However, there may be a small reduction of pain using TAP blocks compared to local anaesthetic or sham blocks. The TAP block is probably safe, since no adverse events were noted amongst the 525 women who received a block, and for whom safety data were available. The evidence is limited by heterogeneity in the results, risk of bias in the studies, and assumptions made for synthesis when combining data.

fundingThe review had no dedicated funding. REGISTRATION: Protocol (2022): DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015145.

Indexed as

Abdominal MusclesGynecologic Surgical ProceduresLaparoscopyNerve BlockPostoperative PainRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, LocalBiasFemaleHumansPain MeasurementPostoperative Nausea and VomitingRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnalgesics, OpioidAnesthetics, Local

Identifiers

PMID40178137
PMCPMC11967164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.