Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40178069›Full record

ArticleEcology letters2025

Plant Acquisitive Strategies Promote Resistance and Temporal Stability of Semiarid Grasslands.

Pu Yan, Nianpeng He, Marcos Fernández-Martínez, Xian Yang, Yiping Zuo, Hao Zhang, Jing Wang, Shiping Chen, Jian Song, Guoyong Li and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Pu YanSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Nianpeng HeKey Laboratory of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management-Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0458-5953
Marcos Fernández-MartínezCREAF, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5661-3610
Xian YangSchool of Ecology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yiping ZuoSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Hao ZhangSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jing WangKey Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Shiping ChenState Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Jian SongSchool of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9957-6533
Guoyong LiInternational Joint Research Laboratory for Global Change Ecology, School of Life Sciences, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0932-4063
Enrique ValenciaDepartment of Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolution, Faculty of Biological Science, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Shiqiang WanSchool of Life Sciences, Institute of Life Science and Green Development, Hebei University, Baoding, China.
Lin JiangSchool of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7114-0794

Funding

National Science Foundation DEB-1856318Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades) PID2022-140398NA-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among ecologists, it is widely believed that conservative growth strategies of plants are crucial for sustaining ecosystem stability, while the potential stabilising role of acquisitive strategies has received little attention. We investigated the relationships between plant traits and three stability dimensions-temporal stability, resistance and resilience-using two complementary datasets from drought-affected semi-arid grasslands: a temporal plant community survey from a single site and a 1000-km transect survey with satellite-derived productivity estimates. We found strikingly consistent patterns from the two datasets, with grasslands dominated by acquisitive strategies exhibiting greater resistance and temporal stability of productivity. Acquisitive strategies enhance stability by facilitating drought escape and avoidance, rather than drought tolerance typically associated with conservative strategies. These results highlight the important but underappreciated role of acquisitive strategies in enhancing ecosystem resistance to disturbances and maintaining temporal stability in semi-arid grasslands.

Indexed as

DroughtsGrasslandPoaceaeacquisitive strategiesconservative strategiesdroughtplant functional traitssemi‐arid grasslandsstability

Identifiers

PMID40178069
PMCPMC11967160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.