Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40177991›Full record

ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2025

CMV2U-Net: A U-shaped network with edge-weighted features for detecting and localizing image splicing.

Arslan Akram, Muhammad Arfan Jaffar, Javed Rashid, Salah Mahmoud Boulaaras, Muhammad Faheem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Arslan AkramFaculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, The Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Muhammad Arfan JaffarFaculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, The Superior University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Javed RashidInformation Technology Services, University of Okara, Okara, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3416-9720
Salah Mahmoud BoulaarasDepartment of Mathematics, College of Science, Qassim University, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad FaheemVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The practice of cutting and pasting portions of one image into another, known as "image splicing," is commonplace in the field of image manipulation. Image splicing detection using deep learning has been a hot research topic for the past few years. However, there are two problems with the way deep learning is currently implemented: first, it is not good enough for feature fusion, and second, it uses only simple models for feature extraction and encoding, which makes the models vulnerable to overfitting. To tackle these problems, this research proposes CMV2U-Net, an edge-weighted U-shaped network-based image splicing forgery localization approach. An initial step is the development of a feature extraction module that can process two streams of input images simultaneously, allowing for the simultaneous extraction of semantically connected and semantically agnostic features. One characteristic is that a hierarchical fusion approach has been devised to prevent data loss in shallow features that are either semantically related or semantically irrelevant. This approach implements a channel attention mechanism to monitor manipulation trajectories involving multiple levels. Extensive trials on numerous public datasets prove that CMV2U-Net provides high AUC and F

Indexed as

digital forensicsfeature fusionimage authenticationimage forgery localizationimage splicing detectionU‐shaped network

Identifiers

PMID40177991
PMCPMC12153247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.