ArticleJMIR medical education2025
Preclinical Medical Students' Perspectives and Experiences With Structured Web-Based English for Medical Purposes Courses: Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in JMIR medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design, implementation, and evaluation of IIIDDS: a structured WhatsApp case-discussion curriculum in undergraduate radiology education.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Challenges and coping strategies for achieving terminology precision in EMI medical writing among Saudi medical students.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of Motivational Interviewing Education on General Practitioners' and Trainees' Learning and Diabetes Outcomes in Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: English for medical purposes (EMP) is essential for medical students as it serves as a foundational language for medical communication and education. However, students often undervalue its importance within the medical curriculum. Given their demanding schedules and workload, educational methods for EMP must align with their needs. Structured web-based learning offers flexibility and convenience, yet limited research has explored its exclusive application for EMP in undergraduate medical education. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate medical students' perspectives on structured web-based EMP courses and assess their impact on medical English proficiency using objective and subjective measures. Methods: Structured web-based EMP courses were developed based on evidence-based guidelines, addressing barriers to web-based learning during development and implementation. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 535 medical students who completed these courses. Data were collected via questionnaires, the learning management system, and the Khon Kaen University Medical English Test (KKUMET), which assessed proficiency in listening, reading, writing, and speaking. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results: Of the 535 students, 452 (84.5%) completed the survey. Participants reported confidence in reading (mean 4.11, SD 0.87), vocabulary (mean 4.04, SD 0.84), and listening skills (mean 4, SD 0.89), but lower confidence in writing skills (mean 3.46, SD 1.07). The KKUMET results showed statistically significant improvements in all 4 language skills after course completion (P<.001). The top-rated benefits of the courses were convenience (mean 4.77, SD 0.59), sufficient instruction (mean 4.5, SD 0.85), and clear content (mean 4.41, SD 0.80). Conclusions: Structured web-based EMP courses are relevant and well received by medical students. These courses significantly improve students' medical English proficiency, as evidenced by both subjective feedback and objective measures. Medical educators should consider integrating structured web-based EMP programs to better support students' language proficiency in medical contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.