Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40177832›Full record

ArticleNeuroreport2025

Cathepsin B promotes optic nerve axonal regeneration.

Si Zhang, Hui Zhu, Guopei Li, Min Zhu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroreport, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Si ZhangDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan.
Hui ZhuDepartment of Ophthalmology, The Second People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Guopei LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan.
Min ZhuDepartment of Ophthalmology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study explored the role of cathepsin B (CTSB) in optic nerve regeneration. Sprague-Dawley rats were utilized for optic nerve crush and long-range crush injury model. Gene and protein expression changes were analyzed via reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction and western blot. Primary cortical neurons and BV2 cells were cultured to assess CTSB's effects on neuronal outgrowth and microglial activity. Local CTSB administration degraded chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs), promoting axonal growth in-vivo. In-vitro, CTSB neutralized CSPG-mediated inhibition of neuronal growth. Quantitative proteomics revealed elevated microglial marker proteins in the regenerative environment. Activation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 6 (STAT6) pathways in BV2 cells increased CTSB secretion. These findings suggest that postinjury regenerative microenvironment reconstruction is associated with upregulated CTSB, which degrades CSPGs to facilitate axonal growth. Microglia-derived CTSB, regulated by STAT3/STAT6 signaling, may play a key role in this process. Modulating CTSB expression could thus be a therapeutic strategy to enhance optic nerve regeneration by modifying the injury microenvironment.

Indexed as

AxonsCathepsin BNerve RegenerationOptic NerveOptic Nerve InjuriesAnimalsCells, CulturedChondroitin Sulfate ProteoglycansMaleMiceMicrogliaNeuronsRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySignal TransductionSTAT3 Transcription FactorCathepsin BChondroitin Sulfate ProteoglycansStat3 protein, ratSTAT3 Transcription FactorSTAT6 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID40177832
PMCPMC11949221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.