ReviewPatient preference and adherence2025
Colonoscopy Uptake in First-Degree Relatives of CRC Patients: Challenges and Intervention Strategies.
Review in Patient preference and adherence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Colorectal Cancer Screening in Hereditary and Familial High-Risk Populations: Best Practices and Future Directions.International journal of cancer · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is crucial for early detection and prevention. However, the willingness of first-degree relatives of CRC patients to undergo colonoscopy often remains low, impacting early diagnosis and treatment outcomes. Methods: This article reviewed the relevant concepts, research status, evaluation methods, influencing factors and intervention measures of first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer. Results: Through the review, it is found that there is still a large gap in the research on the development of assessment tools and intervention programs. Existing intervention programs often fail to address the unique demographic, cognitive, psychological, family dynamic, and social barriers faced by this population. Future research should prioritize the development of specific assessment tools that can accurately measure the willingness of first-degree relatives to undergo colonoscopy, taking into account cultural nuances and contextual factors. By addressing psychological and social factors, researchers can develop more targeted and effective programs that enhance understanding and motivation for colonoscopy screening. Conclusion: This study provides references for domestic research on the willingness of first-degree relatives for colonoscopy, provide new ideas for formulating intervention methods more suitable for first-degree relatives for colonoscopy, and promote their willingness to perform colonoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.