ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2025
Synapses mediate the effects of different types of stress on working memory: a brain-inspired spiking neural network study.
Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute stress results from sudden short-term events, and individuals need to quickly adjust their physiological and psychological to re-establish balance. Chronic stress, on the other hand, results in long-term physiological and psychological burdens due to the continued existence of stressors, making it difficult for individuals to recover and prone to pathological symptoms. Both types of stress can affect working memory and change cognitive function. In this study, we explored the impact of acute and chronic stress on synaptic modulation using a biologically inspired, data-driven rodent prefrontal neural network model. The model consists of a specific number of excitatory and inhibitory neurons that are connected through AMPA, NMDA, and GABA synapses. The study used a short-term recall to simulate working memory tasks and assess the ability of neuronal populations to maintain information over time. The results showed that acute stress can enhance working memory information retention by enhancing AMPA and NMDA synaptic currents. In contrast, chronic stress reduces dendritic spine density and weakens the regulatory effect of GABA currents on working memory tasks. In addition, this structural damage can be complemented by strong connections between excitatory neurons with the same selectivity. These findings provide a reference scheme for understanding the neural basis of working memory under different stress conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.