Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40177533›Full record

ArticlePragmatic and observational research2025

Shifting from Traditional to Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trials: Insights and Lessons Learned from the Toddler Oral Health Intervention.

Brenda G Grift, Peggy C J M van Spreuwel, Josef J J M Bruers, Katarina Jerković-Ćosić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pragmatic and observational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brenda G GriftUniversity of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Research Group Innovation in Preventive Healthcare, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0006-4552-6796
Peggy C J M van SpreuwelUniversity of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Research Group Innovation in Preventive Healthcare, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Josef J J M BruersAcademic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), Department of Oral Public Health, University of Amsterdam and VU University, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3755-2947
Katarina Jerković-ĆosićUniversity of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Research Group Innovation in Preventive Healthcare, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This article examines the implementation of the Toddler Oral Health Intervention (TOHI) protocol, emphasizing feasibility, recruitment, retention, and protocol adherence rather than clinical outcomes. It discusses encountered challenges, necessary adjustments, and key lessons learned during the shift from a traditional randomized controlled trial (RCT) to a pragmatic RCT, thereby offering guidance for future research on similar complex interventions. Methods: The methods of the RCT study protocol are presented, including (1) recruitment of well-baby clinics and oral health coaches, (2) recruitment of the study population; (3) implementation of the intervention and (4) outcome measures, alongside with the process of implementation and gathered feedback needed for required adjustments. A systematic analysis identified key protocol elements, modifications made, and lessons learned. Results: Specific protocol modifications, including adjustments due to the COVID-19 pandemic, demonstrate how a traditional RCT can be adapted to real-world conditions without compromising outcome reliability. Key lessons include the necessity of robust contingency planning to manage unforeseen disruptions, effective recruitment and retention strategies to sustain participant and interventionists engagement, and the adoption of standardized data collection processes to ensure data integrity. These findings underscore the importance of addressing practical and contextual factors alongside measuring effectiveness, ensuring that study outcomes are both applicable and useful in clinical practice. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate that carefully planned and documented pragmatic adjustments not only preserve scientific rigor but also enhance the relevance and applicability of the results, maintaining the methodological robustness expected of traditional RCTs.

Indexed as

lessons learnedpragmatic randomized controlled trialsreal-world setting

Identifiers

PMID40177533
PMCPMC11963812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.