ReviewPCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2025
How "mood-incongruent psychosis" was included under affective disorders in the DSM-III.
Review in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- How "mood-incongruent psychosis" was included under affective disorders in the DSM-III.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Third Edition (DSM-III), the prototype of the modern DSMs, differed from previous traditions in American psychiatry in that it was etiologically agnostic. It also represented a re-importation of German psychiatry for the first time since Freud. An exception, however, was the hierarchical relationship between mood and psychosis, which was weighted in favor of mood in the United States. Specifically, mood-incongruent psychosis was considered a symptom that could also occur in affective (mood) disorders. This was a decision that also differed from the Ninth Revision of the International Statistical Classification of Disease, which was published 3 years before the DSM-III. It was not until the nineteenth century that a distinction was made between mood and psychosis. In Germany, the emphasis was on psychosis, whereas in the United States, under the strong influence of Adolf Meyer, the emphasis was on depression. Hallucinatory and delusional states, later summarized as Kurt Schneider's "first-rank symptoms" (FRS), were also incorporated into the framework for mood disorders. Subsequently, the United States entered the heyday of psychoanalysis, while German descriptive psychopathology was difficult to accept. When the DSM-III was drafted in the 1970s, the FRS were "cut out" from that descriptive psychopathology and introduced. However, since that time, the FRS, along with other mood-incongruent psychoses, have lost their specificity for schizophrenia and organic psychosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.