Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40177498›Full record

ReviewPCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences2025

How "mood-incongruent psychosis" was included under affective disorders in the DSM-III.

Hiroyuki Takiue

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. How "mood-incongruent psychosis" was included under affective disorders in the DSM-III.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hiroyuki TakiueDepartment of Psychiatry Tokyo Metropolitan Matsuzawa Hospital Setagaya-ku Tokyo Japan.ORCID 0009-0000-3199-0404

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Third Edition (DSM-III), the prototype of the modern DSMs, differed from previous traditions in American psychiatry in that it was etiologically agnostic. It also represented a re-importation of German psychiatry for the first time since Freud. An exception, however, was the hierarchical relationship between mood and psychosis, which was weighted in favor of mood in the United States. Specifically, mood-incongruent psychosis was considered a symptom that could also occur in affective (mood) disorders. This was a decision that also differed from the Ninth Revision of the International Statistical Classification of Disease, which was published 3 years before the DSM-III. It was not until the nineteenth century that a distinction was made between mood and psychosis. In Germany, the emphasis was on psychosis, whereas in the United States, under the strong influence of Adolf Meyer, the emphasis was on depression. Hallucinatory and delusional states, later summarized as Kurt Schneider's "first-rank symptoms" (FRS), were also incorporated into the framework for mood disorders. Subsequently, the United States entered the heyday of psychoanalysis, while German descriptive psychopathology was difficult to accept. When the DSM-III was drafted in the 1970s, the FRS were "cut out" from that descriptive psychopathology and introduced. However, since that time, the FRS, along with other mood-incongruent psychoses, have lost their specificity for schizophrenia and organic psychosis.

Indexed as

ego‐psychology schoolFeighner criteriahierarchical principle inversionKarl Jaspersparanoid reaction

Identifiers

PMID40177498
PMCPMC11958606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.