Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40177471›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2025

Medicare Part D insulin coverage: formulary strategies amid policy headwinds.

Christine Buttorff, Hannah O James, Melony E Sorbero, Rachel O Reid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christine ButtorffRAND, Health Care Division, Department of Economics, Sociology & Statistics, Arlington, VA 22202, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4993-2581
Hannah O JamesRAND, Health Care Division, Department of Behavioral & Policy Sciences, Boston, MA 02116, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5977-149X
Melony E SorberoRAND, Health Care Division, Department of Economics, Sociology & Statistics, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9222-8798
Rachel O ReidRAND, Health Care Division, Department of Behavioral & Policy Sciences, Boston, MA 02116, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0462-0568

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, multiple insulin-related policies took effect for Medicare Part D plans, including the Part D Senior Savings Model test (2021-2023) and the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, provisions of which were implemented between 2023 and 2025. These policies created a variety of financial incentives for plans that may influence insulin formulary design in Part D, potentially affecting beneficiary access to insulin. For example, while limiting cost-sharing lowers out-of-pocket costs for beneficiaries, it may also reduce plans' ability to use tiering to steer beneficiaries toward preferred insulins. Using Part D formulary files from 2020-2025 we examined plan insulin coverage separately for Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug Plans and stand-alone Prescription Drug Plans. We found that plans are moving insulins to a single tier but not broadly changing their utilization management tool strategies. Combination agents (insulins paired with GLP-1s) account for the majority of insulins with quantity limits, and concentrated insulins account for the bulk of insulins with prior authorization requirements. This study demonstrates strategic adjustments that insurers may be making in response to policy changes; ongoing study will be needed to monitor access to and spending on insulin in Medicare as the market and policy context continue to evolve.

Indexed as

formulary designInflation Reduction ActinsulinMedicare AdvantagePart DPart D Senior Savings Modelutilization management

Identifiers

PMID40177471
PMCPMC11959358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.