Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40177412›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2025

Prevalence and Risk Factors Associated With Cesarean Section in Syria: A Cross-Sectional Study of the Two Largest Health Centers.

Mohammed Abdulrazzak, Mohammed Moutaz Alshaghel, Moustafa Alhashemi, Wafik Mayo, Sana Oubari, Bakri Roumi Jamal, Muhammad Shahem Shammaa, Zahraa Jabas, Osama Al Horani, Mohamad Ali Keblawi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mohammed AbdulrazzakFaculty of Medicine, University of Aleppo Aleppo Syria.ORCID 0000-0003-0807-9000
Mohammed Moutaz AlshaghelFaculty of Medicine, University of Aleppo Aleppo Syria.ORCID 0000-0002-0333-7800
Moustafa AlhashemiFaculty of Medicine, University of Aleppo Aleppo Syria.ORCID 0000-0002-1130-5446
Wafik MayoFaculty of Medicine, University of Aleppo Aleppo Syria.ORCID 0000-0002-5004-0989
Sana OubariFaculty of Medicine, University of Aleppo Aleppo Syria.ORCID 0000-0003-2342-9734
Bakri Roumi JamalFaculty of Medicine, University of Aleppo Aleppo Syria.ORCID 0000-0003-0903-0794
Muhammad Shahem ShammaaFaculty of Medicine, University of Aleppo Aleppo Syria.ORCID 0009-0003-7611-7109
Zahraa JabasFaculty of Medicine, University of Aleppo Aleppo Syria.ORCID 0009-0000-8243-0722
Osama Al HoraniFaculty of Medicine, University of Damascus Damascus Syria.ORCID 0000-0001-6363-2898
Mohamad Ali KeblawiFaculty of Medicine, University of Aleppo Aleppo Syria.
Hamdi NawfalFaculty of Medicine, University of Aleppo Aleppo Syria.
Data Collection Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: A cesarean section (CS) is a surgical procedure used during pregnancy and childbirth to ensure maternal and fetal well-being. Global CS rates are increasing, with different studies demonstrating this trend. The purpose of this study, is to look into the prevalence of CS and its contributing factors in Syrian hospitals. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted at Aleppo University Hospital and Damascus University Hospital in Syria. The data were collected from patients' medical records during the period between January and December 2021. The study population included women who gave birth at these hospitals in 2021. The study used a questionnaire with four domains: sociodemographic features, mother's history, birth history, newborn information, and delivery type with indications and complications. CS indications were evaluated using protocols from the Association of Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF). Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS Statistics 25.0. Results: Among the deliveries, 47.4% were C-sections, with slightly higher rate at Damascus. Population characteristics revealed differences in age, residency, smoking history, birth details, and associated medical conditions. The majority of participants were aged above 25 years old, rural residents, and nonsmokers. The primary CS cases were mainly medically indicated. Most C-sections were repeat procedures (68%), with fetal distress being the most common indication. Aleppo had higher repeat C-section rates (71.5% vs. 65.5% in Damascus). Most primary C-sections were medically indicated (85.2%), while 14.8% were non-indicated, often due to maternal requests or previous complicated births. Conclusion: This study sheds light on CS prevalence, indications, and influencing factors in Syria, contributing to the broader discourse on optimizing CS rates and improving maternal and neonatal outcomes. Further research is necessary to explore additional factors and interventions to curb unnecessary CS procedures.

Indexed as

cesarian sectiondeliverypregnancyprimary C‐SectionSyria

Identifiers

PMID40177412
PMCPMC11962053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.