Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40177377›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2025

How do neurons live long and healthy? The mechanism of neuronal genome integrity.

Dai Ihara, Nur Rasyiqin Rasli, Yu Katsuyama

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dai IharaDivision of Neuroanatomy, Department of Anatomy, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.
Nur Rasyiqin RasliDivision of Neuroanatomy, Department of Anatomy, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.
Yu KatsuyamaDivision of Neuroanatomy, Department of Anatomy, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome DNA of neurons in the brain is unstable, and mutations caused by inaccurate repair can lead to neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative disorders. Damage to the neuronal genome is induced both exogenously and endogenously. Rapid cell proliferation of neural stem cells during embryonic brain development can lead to errors in genome duplication. Electrical excitations and drastic changes in gene expression in functional neurons cause risks of damaging genomic DNA. The precise repair of DNA damages caused by events making genomic DNA unstable maintains neuronal functions. The maintenance of the DNA sequence and structure of the genome is known as genomic integrity. Molecular mechanisms that maintain genomic integrity are critical for healthy neuronal function. In this review, we describe recent progress in understanding the genome integrity in functional neurons referring to their disruptions reported in neurological diseases.

Indexed as

DNA repairgenome integrityG-quadruplexR-looptopoisomerase

Identifiers

PMID40177377
PMCPMC11961891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.