ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Automated detection of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: harnessing the power of natural language processing.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning based predictive analytics in cervical myelopathy - a scoping review.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The objective of this study was to develop machine learning (ML) algorithms utilizing natural language processing (NLP) techniques for the automated detection of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) through the analysis of positive symptoms in free-text admission notes. This approach enables the timely identification and management of CSM, leading to optimal outcomes. Methods: The dataset consisted of 1,214 patients diagnosed with cervical diseases as their primary condition between June 2013 and June 2020. A random ratio of 7:3 was employed to partition the dataset into training and testing subsets. Two machine learning models, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Bidirectional Long Short Term Memory Network (LSTM), were developed. The performance of these models was assessed using various metrics, including the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, Area Under the Curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score. Results: In the testing set, the LSTM achieved an AUC of 0.9025, an accuracy of 0.8740, a recall of 0.9560, an F1 score of 0.9122, and a precision of 0.8723. The LSTM model demonstrated superior clinical applicability compared to the XGBoost model, as evidenced by calibration curves and decision curve analysis. Conclusions: The timely identification of suspected CSM allows for prompt confirmation of diagnosis and treatment. The utilization of NLP algorithm demonstrated excellent discriminatory capabilities in identifying CSM based on positive symptoms in free-text admission notes complaint data. This study showcases the potential of a pre-diagnosis system in the field of spine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.