Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40177297›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science

Patterns of Myopia Progression in European Adults.

Michael Moore, Gareth Lingham, Daniel I Flitcroft, James Loughman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. IMI-2025 Digest.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael MooreCentre for Eye Research Ireland, School of Physics, Clinical and Optometric Sciences, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Gareth LinghamCentre for Eye Research Ireland, School of Physics, Clinical and Optometric Sciences, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Daniel I FlitcroftCentre for Eye Research Ireland, School of Physics, Clinical and Optometric Sciences, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
James LoughmanCentre for Eye Research Ireland, School of Physics, Clinical and Optometric Sciences, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Data regarding the progression of myopia and new-onset myopia in young adults are lacking. This study aims to describe the natural history of myopia development and progression in adults using anonymized electronic medical records from Irish optometric practices. Design: Longitudinal study. Subjects: Electronic medical record data were extracted from 40 Irish optometry practices with 18 620 (59.5% female) patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Methods: Refractive error change was determined among patients with multiple eye examination visits during the period January 1, 2003 to December 31, 2022. Patients aged 18 to 39 years, inclusive, at baseline and attending >1 eye examination with an interval of ≥11 months between visits and that were myopic at the final visit were included in the analysis. Annualized myopia progression in diopter (D)/year was assessed using linear mixed models with age, sex, baseline spherical equivalent refraction, and previous myopic progression as fixed effect covariates. The proportion of patients with unstable myopia (progression worse than -0.25 D/year) was determined. Main Outcome Measures: Proportion of adults across the age range 18 to 39 years with significant myopic progression. Results: Significant myopia progression (progression <-0.25 D/year) was noted in 10.7% of all myopes. The proportion of myopes with significant progression was clearly related to age with 19.9% of myopes in the youngest age group experiencing progression compared with 6.8% in the oldest age group. Higher proportions of myopic progression were also observed in high myopes with 1 in 12 high myopes (8.0%) exhibiting persistent fast myopic progression as adults (worse than -0.50 D/year). Of patients with emmetropia or hyperopia at baseline in this clinic-based population, 28.5% and 0.8% became myopic during the follow-up period. Conclusions: Although myopia has stabilized in most adults (>18 years of age), a sizeable proportion of younger adults and high myopes (of all ages) do progress at a clinically significant rate. Almost 3 times as many adults in youngest age group (18-24 years) experienced myopic progression when compared with the oldest age group (40-44 years). Consideration should therefore be given to exploring the efficacy and benefit of myopia management in this cohort of patients. Financial Disclosures: The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Indexed as

Adult myopiaElectronic medical recordsEuropean myopic progressionMyopiaMyopic progression

Identifiers

PMID40177297
PMCPMC11964732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.