Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40177285›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025

Strategies to support the mental health and well-being of health and care workforce: a rapid review of reviews.

Cindy E Frias, Nimesh Samarasinghe, Cecilia Cuzco, Jaseem Koorankot, Andrés de Juan, Husameldin Mohamed Ali Rudwan, Hanan F Abdul Rahim, Adela Zabalegui, Iain Tulley, Sanaa T Al-Harahsheh and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Cindy E FriasHospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Nimesh SamarasingheHamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Cecilia CuzcoFundamentals and Clinical Nursing Department, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jaseem KoorankotHamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Andrés de JuanHospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Husameldin Mohamed Ali RudwanHamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Hanan F Abdul RahimCollege of Health Sciences, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Adela ZabaleguiHospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Iain TulleyHamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Sanaa T Al-HarahshehQatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar.
Mona Shaheen S T Al-HomaiddiHamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Meredith Fendt-NewlinWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Jim CampbellWorld Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Countries globally face challenges in educating, employing and retaining their health and care workforce, largely due to underinvestment in health systems. Health and care workforce report significantly greater levels of job-related burnout and mental health problems, which in turn are associated with poorer patient outcomes, increased medical errors, diminished quality and safety, decreased patient satisfaction, and reduced healthcare efficiency. Objective: We conducted a rapid review of systematic reviews to evaluate the mental health and well-being of health and care workers since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and to identify interventions available at organizational and individual levels. Methods: PubMed and Epistemonikos were searched for systematic reviews published between May 2022 and February 2024. The inclusion criteria were systematic reviews written in English with quantitative design, with or without meta-analysis. Results: Fifty articles met the criteria for inclusion in the analysis. Overall, there has not been a significant change in the prevalence of depression and anxiety among health and care workforce since 2022, suggesting the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on workers' mental health and well-being was not specific to their experience working during the pandemic. Sixteen studies reported two types of mental health and well-being interventions: individual-level interventions and organizational-level interventions with specific impact on mental health and work environment variables. No specific policy interventions were found. However, some studies suggested policy interventions to improve the mental health and well-being of the health and care workforce. Discussion: Our analysis highlighted the need for systemic changes to protect the mental health and well-being of the health and care workforce in the post-COVID-19 era. Despite the wealth of evidence on mental health problems and on effective interventions, there remains a notable gap in systemic implementation and organizational accountability. The call to action for a paradigm shift must be embraced and we must strive to build resilient healthcare systems and invest in active support and sustain them, incorporating structural, non-structural and functional aspects of organizational resilience.

Indexed as

anxietyburnoutdepressionhealthcare workershealth systems resiliencemental healthpublic health workforcerapid review

Identifiers

PMID40177285
PMCPMC11961965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.