ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
Advances in the clinical diagnosis of lung cancer using contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Habitat model based on CEUS for noninvasive prediction of EGFR mutation status in peripheral NSCLC.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- The Role of CEUS in the Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Pleuropulmonary Diseases and Interventional Procedures.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Comparison of intravenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma.American journal of cancer research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer (LC) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide, emphasizing the urgent need for innovative diagnostic tools to improve early detection and patient outcomes. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has emerged as a promising complement to conventional imaging modalities, offering distinct advantages such as real-time dynamic imaging, cost-effectiveness, and the absence of ionizing radiation. By enhancing the visualization of tumor vascularization, CEUS enables differentiation between benign and malignant pulmonary nodules while providing valuable insights into tumor angiogenesis, a hallmark of malignancy, and therapeutic response. Additionally, CEUS demonstrates utility in assessing regional lymph nodes, detecting distant metastases, and analyzing blood flow dynamics through quantitative methods such as time-intensity curve analysis. Despite these benefits, certain limitations persist, including reduced efficacy in imaging deep-seated lesions, variability due to patient-specific physiological factors, and dependency on operator expertise. However, advancements in targeted contrast agents, integration with multimodal imaging techniques, and the application of artificial intelligence hold significant potential to address these challenges. This review systematically evaluates the clinical applications, advantages, and limitations of CEUS in LC diagnosis, providing a comprehensive understanding of its role in modern precision oncology. Furthermore, it highlights future research directions aimed at enhancing diagnostic accuracy, improving clinical workflows, and expanding the adoption of CEUS in routine practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.