ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025
The promise and limitations of artificial intelligence in CTPA-based pulmonary embolism detection.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Accuracy of AI-Based Algorithms in Pulmonary Embolism Detection on Computed Tomographic Pulmonary Angiography: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Quantitative assessment of risk stratification of acute pulmonary embolism based on three-dimensional computed tomography bronchography and angiography.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Lesion feature enhancement and boundary-aware fusion for pulmonary embolism recognition on CT images.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Large language models in emergency and critical care medicine: a comprehensive review of applications, challenges, and future directions.Burns & trauma · 2026Review
- Advancements in Acute Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis and Treatment: A Narrative Review of Emerging Imaging Techniques and Intravascular Interventions.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosing Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Archives of academic emergency medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is an essential diagnostic tool for identifying pulmonary embolism (PE). The integration of AI has significantly advanced CTPA-based PE detection, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. This review investigates the growing role of AI in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism using CTPA imaging. The review examines the capabilities of AI algorithms, particularly deep learning models, in analyzing CTPA images for PE detection. It assesses their sensitivity and specificity compared to human radiologists. AI systems, using large datasets and complex neural networks, demonstrate remarkable proficiency in identifying subtle signs of PE, aiding clinicians in timely and accurate diagnosis. In addition, AI-powered CTPA analysis shows promise in risk stratification, prognosis prediction, and treatment optimization for PE patients. Automated image interpretation and quantitative analysis facilitate rapid triage of suspected cases, enabling prompt intervention and reducing diagnostic delays. Despite these advancements, several limitations remain, including algorithm bias, interpretability issues, and the necessity for rigorous validation, which hinder widespread adoption in clinical practice. Furthermore, integrating AI into existing healthcare systems requires careful consideration of regulatory, ethical, and legal implications. In conclusion, AI-driven CTPA-based PE detection presents unprecedented opportunities to enhance diagnostic precision and efficiency. However, addressing the associated limitations is critical for safe and effective implementation in routine clinical practice. Successful utilization of AI in revolutionizing PE care necessitates close collaboration among researchers, medical professionals, and regulatory organizations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.