ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025
Basic research on postoperative cognitive dysfunction in the past decade: a bibliometric analysis.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prediction models for postoperative cognitive dysfunction in adults: a systematic review of methodological quality and clinical applicability.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Preoperative cognitive impairment predicts deep anaesthesia and higher postoperative pain in elderly patients: an observational study.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Observational
- Comparative Effectiveness of Propofol-Sufentanil vs Propofol-Fentanyl in Elderly Patients Undergoing Transurethral Resection of the Prostate.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) is a prevalent complication following anesthesia and surgery that particularly affects elderly patients, and poses significant health risks. In recent years, there has been an increase in basic research on POCD, with a particular focus on its molecular mechanisms, which have become a prominent area of inquiry. However, no bibliometric analysis has been conducted in this field. This study aims to employ bibliometric methods to comprehensively summarize the current status and developmental trends of basic research on POCD, providing new ideas and strategies for future scientific investigations. Methods: Relevant literature published between January 1, 2014, and October 30, 2024, was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection. Eligible articles were exported in plain text format. The annual output of published papers and data on authors, countries/institutions, journals, keywords, co-cited journals, and co-cited literature were analyzed and visualized using Microsoft Excel, VOSviewer, and CiteSpace software. Results: A total of 479 papers from 13 countries were included, with a noticeable upward trend in publications over the past decade, particularly in the last 3 years. A total of 105 core authors published four or more papers, with Professor Zuozhiyi identified as the leading contributor. "The Journal of Neuroinflammation" emerged as the most prolific publication source, while Chinese scholars accounted for the highest number of contributions and Dutch scholars led in citations per article. The University of Virginia was the leading institution for publications. Analysis of research hotspots revealed "neuroinflammation," "surgery," "impairment," "memory," and "information" as frequently occurring keywords. Notably, "pyroptosis" was identified as a current research hotspot and "synaptic plasticity" as a rapidly emerging term. The top five cited journals were all ranked as Q1 journals, with "Anesthesiology" being the most cited. Within co-cited articles, the "hippocampal CA1 region" represented the largest cluster, and literature on "neuroinflammation" was a key reference in current discussions. Conclusion: Over the past decade, basic research on POCD has steadily increased, particularly among Chinese scholars. Bibliometric analysis revealed that the molecular mechanisms underlying POCD are likely crucial focuses of current and future research. This field holds significant potential for further development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.