ArticleCase reports in gastroenterology
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Suspected Locoregional Rectal Cancer Localizations: A Valuable Tool.
Article in Case reports in gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Organ-preserving treatment for rectal cancer using local excision (LE) and/or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is increasingly used. Locoregional metastasis precludes LE and locoregional regrowth, recurrence, or persistence after LE or chemoradiation (CRT) may prompt total mesorectal excision (TME). We believe that the time has passed to make such life-changing treatment decisions without pathological confirmation and investigated the use of linear endoscopic ultrasound with fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). Case Presentations: We report 8 cases of suspected locoregional tumor growth (LRTG) on MRI: adjacent or in the rectal wall, within the mesorectal fascia, high presacral region, and obturator foramen. MRI images were studied thoroughly before and during EUS to identify the target lesion using rectal EUS-FNA. Patients were prepared using an enema. The procedure was performed on an outpatient basis without conscious sedation. FNA was performed using a 25G needle. The patient received a 3-day course of ciprofloxacin after the procedure to prevent infection of the perirectal space. Identification of the target was the most difficult part of EUS but was successful in all cases. FNA revealed adenocarcinoma in 7 cases. Five cases were confirmed by TME results: 1 patient died before the operation, and 1 patient was treated with CRT. One patient with a suspected node in the obturator foramen was free of tumors on FNA. The TME resection specimen contained 31 lymph nodes without metastasis. All procedures were well tolerated, and no complications were observed. Conclusion: Suspected LRTG on MRI can be confirmed using EUS-FNA. In the era of organ-preserving treatment for rectal cancer, EUS-FNA may play a supportive role when considering TME or CRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.