ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Consumers acceptance of new food ingredients from the food industry's by-products-a focus group study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Consumer Assessment Framework for Alternative-Ingredient Bakery and Confectionery Products: Implications for Nutrition Methodology and Sustainable Diet Research.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Converting Food Waste into Value-Added Products: A Review on Current Technologies, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Psychology of Eating the Future: Consumer Acceptance, Digital Influence and Behavioral Drivers of Novel Foods.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- From Brewing By-Products to Next-Generation Food Ingredients: Processing, Functionality, Safety, and Industrial Translation.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Food Industry By-Products as Natural Preservatives: Supporting Adolescent Food Literacy and Critical Food Choices.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Exploring Chinese Consumers' Perception and Potential Acceptance of Cell-Cultured Meat and Plant-Based Meat: A Focus Group Study and Content Analysis.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food industry by-products can be valorized by extracting various nutritional components, like proteins, dietary fiber or other bioactive compounds, depending on the type of by-products. By adding these to new or already existing food products, the consumers' health and wellbeing may increase due to a more nutritional diet while at the same time increasing the sustainability of the food chain. However, for a successful market implementation of products containing ingredients from by-products, the consumer perception and consumer acceptance are one of the most important aspects that need to be considered. Therefore, focus group studies were organized in four European countries, namely Italy, Germany, Romania and Norway, to investigate the perception, acceptance and willingness of the general population (ages 18-60) to buy these new products. When possible, individual purchasing and consumption trends were analyzed as well to get a deeper insight into the decision-making processes during grocery shopping. In summary, the acceptance of new food ingredients from by-products was high in all four studied countries, and most participants were interested in enriched bakery, meat or dairy products. The main reason for the interest in these new products were health benefits due to an increased nutrient uptake, and to contribute to reducing food waste. However, participants were afraid of new food allergies and intolerances as well as increased concentrations of food contaminants like pesticides or mycotoxins, which makes food safety an important point to consider before developing new products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.