ArticleDigital health
Interactive decision aid on therapy decision making for patients with chronic kidney disease: A prospective exploratory pilot study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05666544 (Developing and Effectiveness Evaluation of Web-based Situation Renal Replacement Therapies Patient Decision Aids), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Developing and Effectiveness Evaluation of Web-based Situation Renal Replacement Therapies Patient Decision Aids
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding the kidney replacement therapy decision-making process.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) face challenging decisions about kidney replacement therapy (KRT) options. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an Interactive Patient-Decision-Aid App for Kidney Replacement Therapy (iPtDA-KRT App) in improving decision self-efficacy, knowledge, and readiness while reducing decisional conflict and regret among patients with advanced CKD. Methods: A prospective, two-arm clinical trial was conducted with 70 patients who used either the mobile app-based iPtDA-KRT or a paper-based PtDA for 4 weeks. Key measures included decision self-efficacy (DSES), decisional conflict (DCS), KRT knowledge (KRTKS), preparation for decision-making (PrepDM), and decision regret (DRS). These measures were assessed immediately post-intervention and at 4 weeks post-intervention. Additionally, outcomes such as DSES, DCS, and DRS were tracked at 8 weeks post-intervention. Data were analyzed using generalized estimating equations. Results: The experimental group included 19 male and 16 female patients with a mean age of 66.4 ± 14.0 years, while the control group included 22 male and 13 female patients with a mean age of 59.7 ± 16.1 years. The experimental group demonstrated significantly greater and sustained improvements in self-efficacy, knowledge, and preparation for decision-making compared to the control group. Reductions in decisional conflict and regret were also maintained over time. Conclusions: The iPtDA-KRT App demonstrated substantial and lasting benefits over paper-based PtDAs in supporting patients' complex decision-making. These findings suggest that digital, interactive PtDAs may enhance informed decision-making, reduce long-term decisional conflict, and improve patient confidence in clinical settings. Trial Registration: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05666544).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.