Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40177117›Full record

ArticleACS applied engineering materials2025

Understanding the Current Distribution and Mass Transport Properties in 3D-Printed Architected Flow-Through Electrodes.

Auston L Clemens, Kyle Jung, Massimiliano Ferrucci, Megan E Ellis, Jonathan T Davis, Swetha Chandrasekaran, Zhen Qi, Christine A Orme, Marcus A Worsley, Rohan Akolkar and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied engineering materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Auston L ClemensMaterials Engineering Division, Engineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1939-169X
Kyle JungMaterials Engineering Division, Engineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.
Massimiliano FerrucciMaterials Science Division, Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.
Megan E EllisMaterials Engineering Division, Engineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.
Jonathan T DavisMaterials Engineering Division, Engineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.
Swetha ChandrasekaranMaterials Science Division, Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.
Zhen QiMaterials Science Division, Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6482-0839
Christine A OrmeMaterials Science Division, Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3652-3367
Marcus A WorsleyMaterials Science Division, Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8012-7727
Rohan AkolkarDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9865-5704
Anna IvanovskayaMaterials Engineering Division, Engineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.
Nikola A DudukovicMaterials Engineering Division, Engineering Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0852-7080

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Architected materials offer promising advancements in energy storage by enabling highly customizable, high-surface-area, ordered, and low-defect porous structures. This study investigates the current distribution and mass transport within complex 3D-printed lattice electrodes under flow-through conditions. Conductive lattices were fabricated using microstereolithography followed by pyrolytic carbonization. Lattice geometry effects were analyzed by varying the unit cell type [simple cubic (SC), body- and face-centered cubic (BCC/FCC), IsoTruss, and Octet], porosity, and current density. Current distribution uniformity was investigated using a model high-efficiency copper deposition reaction. Local film thickness distributions were predicted using a numerical model and validated experimentally using micro-X-ray computed tomography. Scaling relationships for informing electrochemical reaction conditions and current uniformity are formulated as a modified lattice-based Wagner number (

Identifiers

PMID40177117
PMCPMC11960682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.