Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40177106›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2025

Matching dynamically varying forces with multi-motor-unit muscle models: a simulation study.

T Murtola, C Richards

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

T MurtolaDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6641-2150
C RichardsDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Royal Veterinary College, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1908-3577

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human muscles exhibit great versatility, not only generating forces for demanding athleticism, but also for fine motor tasks. While standard musculoskeletal models may reproduce this versatility, they often lack multiple motor units (MUs) and rate-coded control. To investigate how these features affect a muscle's ability to generate desired force profiles, we performed simulations with nine alternative MU pool models for two cases: (i) a tibialis anterior muscle generating an isometric trapezoidal force profile, and (ii) a generic shoulder muscle generating force for a reaching movement whilst undergoing predetermined length changes. We implemented two control strategies, pure feedforward and combined feedforward-feedback, each parameterized using elementary tasks. The results suggest that the characteristics of MU pools have relatively little impact on the pools' overall ability to match forces across all tasks, although performances for individual tasks varied. Feedback improved performance for nearly all MU pools and tasks, but the physiologically more relevant MU pool types were more responsive to feedback particularly during reaching. While all MU pool models performed well in the conditions tested, we highlight the need to consider the functional characteristics of the control of rate-coded MU pools given the vast repertoire of dynamic tasks performed by muscles.

Indexed as

motor controlmotor unit poolmuscle contractionmuscle modelsimulation

Identifiers

PMID40177106
PMCPMC11964109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.