ArticleRoyal Society open science2025
Choice Bracketing revisited: Replication and extensions Registered Report of seven experiments reviewed in Read
Article in Royal Society open science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Revisiting mental accounting classic paradigms: Replication Registered Report of the problems reviewed in Thaler (1999).Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Revisiting partition priming in judgement under uncertainty: replication and extension Registered Report of Fox and Rottenstreich (2003).Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Revisiting the link between true-self and morality: Replication and extension Registered Report of Newman, Bloom, and Knobe (2014) Studies 1 and 2.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Choice Bracketing revisited: Replication and extensions Registered Report of seven experiments reviewed in ReadRoyal Society open science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Choice partitioning refers to the phenomenon when the same choice set yields different decision-making behaviour when they are grouped into sets (broadly bracketed) or evaluated separately (narrowly bracketed). In a Registered Report experiment with a US sample recruited online through Prolific (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.