ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Selection and connection: the impact of internet use on the depression of Chinese older adults.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association between digital smart device use and depression among older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- Development of a machine learning-based screening model for the risk of depression among the elderly in China.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Article
- From online to offline: the impact of digital communication on activity participation among older adults.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The association between internet use and cognition in older adults: empirical analysis based on CLASS 2023.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The double-edged sword of internet use in China's aging population: thresholds, mediation and digital health policy.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Internet media and depression in older adults experiencing pain: Evidence from a five-year longitudinal study (2018-2023).Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Internet usage has significant effects on the mental health of older adults, particularly in reducing depression levels. However, its impact may differ based on factors such as internet usage frequency, purposes, gender, and urban-rural residence. This study aims to examine the differential effects of internet use on depression among older adults, exploring the mediating role of social networks in these relationships. Methods: Based on panel data from the 2018 and 2020 China Longitudinal Aging Social Survey, a fixed-effects model was employed to systematically analyze the impact of internet use (including whether they use the internet, frequency of use, and purposes of use) on the mental health of older adults. The mediating role of social networks (family networks and friend networks) was tested using the Bootstrap method. Results: The study found that internet use significantly reduces depression levels among older adults (coefficient = -0.440, Discussion: This study highlights the complex relationship between internet use, social networks, and mental health in older adults. Significant gender and urban-rural differences exist in the impact of internet use on depression among older adults, indicating the need for tailored interventions. The findings also emphasize the importance of promoting internet use for social purposes while being mindful of the potential negative impacts of excessive digital engagement among older adults, particularly in rural areas. Additionally, social networks, especially friend networks, play an important role in enhancing the mental health benefits of internet use for older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.