Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40177059›Full record

ReviewBJA open2025

Adductor canal block in total knee arthroplasty: a scoping review of the literature.

Nikhil Agarwal, Robert Kay, Andrew D Duckworth, Nicholas D Clement, David M Griffith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJA open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nikhil AgarwalEdinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Robert KayEdinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Andrew D DuckworthEdinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Nicholas D ClementEdinburgh Orthopaedics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
David M GriffithCentre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: An adductor canal block is commonly used to reduce pain after total knee arthroplasty. Practice varies in terms of site of injection, local anaesthetic, and adjuncts used, with poor consensus in relation to the best approach. The aim of this scoping review was to assess the evidence for efficacy and safety of adductor canal block, determine variation in the technique used, type and dose of medication, and compare the efficacy of adductor canal block with other nerve block techniques. Methods: Four databases were searched to identify relevant studies (Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov). A total of 285 articles were found, and data was extracted from 130 randomised controlled trials. Results: Adductor canal block is a safe and potentially effective peripheral nerve block for reducing postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty while preserving motor function. Of all adjuncts to adductor canal block assessed, either dexamethasone or dexmedetomidine provide additional analgesic benefit. Adductor canal block combined with peri-articular local anaesthetic injection provides the best outcomes. Continuous infusion of local anaesthetic through a catheter placed in the adductor canal provides no additional benefit over a single injection. The site of injection used for adductor canal block does not seem to affect efficacy. There was no evidence to support the superiority of any single local anaesthetic agent. Conclusion: This scoping review has identified variation in the use of medications, doses, techniques, and adjuncts for adductor canal block. As such, definitive conclusions regarding the most effective practice for adductor canal block cannot be made.

Indexed as

adductor canal blockadjunctdosefemoral nerve blocklocal infiltration anaesthesiasafetyscoping reviewtotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID40177059
PMCPMC11964494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.