ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Eye movements and user emotional experience: a study in interface design.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Aesthetic preference and gaze-based visual attention in atlas-cover design: Evidence from an eye-tracking study.PloS one · 2026Article
- A hybrid color emotional experience approach: Integrating the pleasure-arousal-dominance model with fuzzy grey relational analysis.PloS one · 2026Article
- Critical factors influencing the adoption of virtual reality technology for improving mental health among university students: an extended technology acceptance model.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the correlation between eye movement metrics and user emotional experience metrics during the user's process of using the interface in a task-oriented manner through an eye-tracking study. Fifty-four participants were recruited, who were divided into two groups and asked to complete the same task using two different sets of interfaces. The two sets of interfaces were proved to have differences in the emotional experience of users before the experiment. The participants' eye movement data were recorded as they operated, and correlation analyzes were performed using biserial correlation tests. The results show that different interface designs affect the three dimensions of user emotional experience (PAD) and also lead to changes in eye movement patterns as the users complete tasks. Interface designs that elicit higher pleasure will lead to longer duration of fixations. Interface designs that elicit higher arousal will lead to more fixations and higher peak velocity of saccades. Interface designs that elicit higher dominance will lead to longer duration of fixations, fewer fixations and fewer saccades. This study identifies eye movement metrics related to the user emotional experience in interface design that are different from those in other fields, providing a new perspective for the scientific validation of the emotional experience in interface design. The designers can apply the findings to optimize the specific interface design to improve the user's emotional experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.