ArticleSkin appendage disorders2025
Bibliometric Analysis of Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment for Hair Restoration, Facial Rejuvenation, Dental Procedures, and Gynecological Rejuvenation.
Article in Skin appendage disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Trends in Hair Loss Treatment: Key Contributions, Emerging Hotspots, and Future Directions.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) technologies offer an attractive treatment option for various medical fields. Owing to its high concentration of growth factors, PRP has been posited to induce proliferation, differentiation, and angiogenesis at the cellular level, as well as wound-healing and remodeling at the tissue level. The goal of the present bibliometric analysis was to characterize the growing body of literature concerning PRP use in various medical applications. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed on June 28, 2024, using Web of Science and SCOPUS databases, covering all available publications in selected categories from 2001 to present. Results: PRP use for hair restoration had both the greatest number of total publications among the investigated applications, whereas PRP use in dental procedures had the longest-standing history of publications. PRP use in hair restoration and facial rejuvenation had the greatest number of placebo-controlled and double-blinded randomized controlled trials; however, the impact of results may suffer from a lack of consistency in PRP preparation and outcome measurement between different studies. Conclusion: To effectively validate the utility of PRP across various medical interventions, careful consideration of methodology should be undertaken for future studies to ensure validity of results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.