ArticleFrontiers in digital health2024
Artificial intelligence application in counselling practices. A multigroup analysis of acceptance and awareness using gender and professional rank.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An AI Perspective on Counseling Supervision.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence into Psychological Counseling: A Narrative Review and Governance Framework.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool in various professional domains, including counselling, where it offers innovative ways to enhance service delivery and client outcomes. Despite its potential, research on AI in counselling practices often focuses on its technical applications, with limited attention to the interplay between awareness, acceptance, and application. This study analyses how professional counsellors apply artificial intelligence in counselling practices using the nexus between awareness and application through acceptance of AI with gender and professional rank as group. Method: A total of 5,432 professional counsellors were selected for the study. Data collection was conducted online to ensure a wide reach. The research instruments underwent validity checks, demonstrating high content and factorial validity. Convergent and discriminant validity were confirmed using the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) and Fornel-Larcker criterion. Results: The findings revealed that professional counsellors exhibited high levels of awareness, acceptability, and application of AI in their counselling practices. Acceptance played a positive mediating role in the relationship between awareness and application. However, male practitioners and professors displayed stronger awareness, acceptance, and application of AI tools compared to their counterparts. Conclusion: The study highlights the significant role of acceptance in bridging awareness and application of AI in counselling practices. It underscores the importance of addressing gender and professional rank disparities to ensure equitable adoption and utilization of AI tools. The findings offer valuable insights for policymakers in promoting the integration of AI in counselling to enhance professional practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.