Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40176910›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Natural products in neurodegenerative diseases: recent advances and future outlook.

L Nahar, R Charoensup, Kulyash Kalieva, E Habibi, M Guo, D Wang, M Kvasnica, A Onder, S D Sarker

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Sesquiterpenoid fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Synthetic Cyclic CAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

L NaharLaboratory of Growth Regulators, Palacký University and Institute of Experimental Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Olomouc, Czechia.
R CharoensupSchool of Integrative Medicine and Medicinal Plants Innovation Center of Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Kulyash KalievaDepartment of Chemistry and Mathematics, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
E HabibiDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medicinal Plants Research Centre, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
M GuoLaboratory of Advanced Theranostic Materials and Technology, Ningbo Institute of Materials Technology and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China.
D WangInternational Joint Laboratory of Medicinal Food Development and Health Products Creation, Biological Engineering Technology Innovation Center of Shandong Province, Heze Branch of Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Heze, China.
M KvasnicaLaboratory of Growth Regulators, Palacký University and Institute of Experimental Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Olomouc, Czechia.
A OnderDepartment of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara University, Ankara, Türkiye.
S D SarkerCentre for Natural Products Discovery, School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and Huntington's are on the rise and pose significant challenges due to the lack of effective treatments. This review critically examines the neuroprotective effects of various natural products derived from plants, marine organisms, and fungi. Natural products have long been used in traditional medicine and are gaining attention in modern drug discovery for their unique properties. The review explains how these natural products can protect neurons by influencing the key biological pathways involved in neurodegeneration. It discusses mechanisms including antioxidant effects, anti-inflammatory actions, modulation of cellular signalling, and support for mitochondrial function. A systematic literature search was conducted to minimize bias and ensure rigorous study selection. Preclinical studies using animal models and cell cultures show that secondary metabolites like polyphenols, alkaloids, and terpenoids can significantly reduce neuronal damage. Some clinical trials have shown promising results. However, challenges such as bioavailability, standardization, and dosage must be addressed to translate these findings into clinical practice. The review also evaluates the potential synergy of combining natural products with conventional treatments, offering a complementary therapeutic approach. Natural products represent a promising avenue for developing innovative treatments for neurodegenerative diseases. The review highlights key research gaps and proposes future directions. Future studies should focus on overcoming existing challenges and refining these natural products to improve their efficacy and safety in clinical settings. The application of existing knowledge has the potential to significantly enhance the quality of life for individuals affected by neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseasebioavailabilityHuntington’s diseasenatural productsneurodegenerative diseasesneuroprotectionParkinson’s diseasepolyphenols

Identifiers

PMID40176910
PMCPMC11961910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.