SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced pancreatitis: a systematic review and real-world pharmacovigilance analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Journey: From Early Promise to Lasting Impact.Journal of immunotherapy and precision oncology · 2026Review
- Type 3 Autoimmune Pancreatitis: What Do We Know So Far?Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- Hepatic and Pancreatobiliary Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Multidisciplinary Approach.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related pancreatitis: a comprehensive review of epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management.Journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Autoimmune Pancreatitis Re-Classification with Novel Type AIP-4.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Drug-induced adverse events in modern pharmacotherapy: mechanisms, clinical manifestations, and implications for risk assessment and management.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Severe renal and pancreatic toxicities associated with ipilimumab and nivolumab combination therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Pancreatitis associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a pharmacovigilance analysis based on FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Immunotherapy-Related Pancreatitis: A Case Series of 8 Patients from a High-Volume Oncology Centre.Case reports in oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Immune checkpoint inhibitors-induced pancreatitis (ICIs-P) is an uncommon immune-related adverse event. The available evidence consists mostly of case reports, case series, and narrative reviews. This research focuses on the clinical characteristics and management options for ICIs-P to provide a practice-based global perspective on this disease. Methods: Five electronic databases were systematically reviewed to identify the relevant studies. Furthermore, we performed a disproportionality analysis utilizing OpenVigil 2.1 to interrogate the United States Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Results: A total of 61 patients from 58 studies were included in this study. Most patients with ICIs-P were males (60.7%). Most patients received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy (78.7%) or anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy in conjunction with CTLA-4 blockade (19.7%). The median time from the initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitors treatment to pancreatitis was 108 days (range 52-278). Most cases were severe or life-threatening (G3-G4; 64.0%). Corticosteroids were administered to 73.8% of the patients during the treatment of pancreatitis. Regarding treatment outcomes, ICIs-P was reversible in most cases (83.6%), despite the 8.2% relapse and 8.2% deaths. We identified 606 reports of pancreatitis associated with ICIs in the FAERS database, with the greatest proportion of males (50.7%), 62.0% of PD-1 inhibitors, and 22.1% of all reports of death or life-threatening outcomes. Signals indicating pancreatitis were observed across all ICIs, with particular emphasis on Cemiplimab, Pembrolizumab and Nivolumab. Conclusion: By using a pharmacovigilance database, we discovered an elevated risk of pancreatitis following ICIs therapy, especially with PD-1 inhibitors. Meanwhile, risk factors for ICIs-P remain poorly understood, and diagnosis is challenging. Which may manifest as asymptomatic elevated pancreatic enzyme levels or clinical pancreatitis. Patients with pancreatitis symptoms should have their lipase and amylase levels and radiology evaluated. Diagnosis should be made by excluding other causes. Steroids are the cornerstone of ICIs-P treatment and slow dose reduction is recommended to reduce recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.