SynthesisFrontiers in psychology2024
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Verification of the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Exteroceptive Body Awareness Questionnaire (EBA-q) in the older Chinese adults.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Assessment of Cognitive Emotion Regulation in Gambling Disorder: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Clinics and practice · 2026Review
- MEPT-LLM: a multimodal generative AI model for identifying and understanding cultural-emotional barriers in the language classroom.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Flexible or Rigid Control of Eating Scale in women.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Participatory adaptation of mental health screening tools for school-aged children: a qualitative study in Slovakia.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) is an important instrument for assessing the perceived effectiveness of emotional regulation strategies. It has been adapted into numerous regional languages worldwide. This systematic review seeks to explore the various versions of the CERQ, focusing on their processes of linguistic and cultural adaptation, as well as their validity and reliability. Methods: Articles were systematically extracted from the literature review using search engines such as PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus. The focus was on identifying studies published in English between the years 2000 and 2024. This review also encompassed various versions of the CERQ that had been adapted and validated to accommodate linguistic and cultural differences. Results: The original database yielded 1,476 search results. After filtering out duplicates, 420 articles were examined. Following a review of the titles and abstracts, 21 studies were identified for further evaluation. Ultimately, 13 versions were chosen for the final analysis. Conclusion: This review offers an in-depth insight into the difficulties faced in cross-cultural adaptation and the psychometric assessment processes. Notably, the predominant approach for translation identified in the reviewed literature was Brislin's classic back-translation model. The findings demonstrate strong test-retest reliability, excellent internal consistency, and reasonable construct validity across various languages, affirming the usability of the translated versions of the CERQ in different linguistic contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.