ArticleJournal of sensor and actuator networks2025
Optimizing Sensor Locations for Electrodermal Activity Monitoring Using a Wearable Belt System.
Article in Journal of sensor and actuator networks, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Flexible and Self-Powered Wearable Sensors for Tremor Monitoring in Parkinson'S Disease: Recent Advances in Materials and Device Architectures.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Toward Accurate Cybersickness Prediction in Virtual Reality: A Multimodal Physiological Modeling Approach.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Wearable devices for continuous health monitoring in humans are constantly evolving, yet the signal quality may be improved by optimizing electrode placement. While the commonly used locations to measure electrodermal activity (EDA) are at the fingers or the wrist, alternative locations, such as the torso, need to be considered when applying an integrated multimodal approach of concurrently recording multiple bio-signals, such as the monitoring of visceral pain symptoms like those related to irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). This study aims to quantitatively determine the EDA signal quality at four torso locations (mid-chest, upper abdomen, lower back, and mid-back) in comparison to EDA signals recorded from the fingers. Concurrent EDA signals from five body locations were collected from twenty healthy participants as they completed a Stroop Task and a Cold Pressor task that elicited salient autonomic responses. Mean skin conductance (meanSCL), non-specific skin conductance responses (NS.SCRs), and sympathetic response (TVSymp) were derived from the torso EDA signals and compared with signals from the fingers. Notably, TVSymp recorded from the mid-chest location showed significant changes between baseline and Stroop phase, consistent with the TVSymp recorded from the fingers. A high correlation (0.77-0.83) was also identified between TVSymp recorded from the fingers and three torso locations: mid-chest, upper abdomen, and lower back locations. While the fingertips remain the optimal site for EDA measurement, the mid-chest exhibited the strongest potential as an alternative recording site, with the upper abdomen and lower back also demonstrating promising results. These findings suggest that torso-based EDA measurements have the potential to provide reliable measurement of sympathetic neural activities and may be incorporated into a wearable belt system for multimodal monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.