ArticlePlant & cell physiology2025
Editing multiple genes in Physalis pubescens provides valuable lessons and implications for creating new germplasm and varieties of Physalis crops.
Article in Plant & cell physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Physalis pubescens, as a staple horticultural crop of Physalis in China, has shortcomings of a single variety, low yield, and unique fruit shape and color. In an attempt to overcome these disadvantages, we employed gene editing technology in the main cultivar "Jinhuang 1" ("JH1") of P. pubescens to reprogram the related traits. Six orthologous genes related to tomato domestication and improvement, which include fruit shape gene OVATE, inflorescence branching gene COMPOUND INFLORESCENCE (S), fruit color gene LYCOPENE BETA CYCLASE (LCY1), and fruit size regulating genes CLAVATA3 (CLV3), FRUIT WEIGHT2.2 (FW2.2), and EXCESSIVE NUMBER OF FLORAL ORGANS (ENO), were identified and edited in "JH1." Phenotypic variations observed in ovate, s, and clv3 of P. pubescens were mainly consistent with those found in tomato mutants, whereas phenotypic variations exhibited by lcy1, eno, and fw2.2 mutants in "JH1" were significantly different from thoseobserved in the corresponding tomato mutants. Moreover, most of these gene-edited mutants showed inferiority to "JH1." Our results mainly revealed that the functions of orthologous genes among close relatives may differ significantly and that pure gene editing for loss-of-function mutations is insufficient to yield elite varieties in P. pubescens, thus offering valuable lessons and insights for genetic and germplasm improvement of Physalis crops.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.