Trial reportJournal of sleep research2025
Automated Sleep Staging in Epilepsy Using Deep Learning on Standard Electroencephalogram and Wearable Data.
Trial report in Journal of sleep research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04284072 (A Multicenter Study to Examine Clinical Scenarios for Long-term Monitoring of Epileptic Seizures With a Wearable Biopotential Technology), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter Study to Examine Clinical Scenarios for Long-term Monitoring of Epileptic Seizures With a Wearable Biopotential Technology
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Sleep Staging in Epilepsy Using Deep Learning on Standard Electroencephalogram and Wearable Data.Journal of sleep research · 2025Trial
- MAF-SleepNet: A Multimodal Attention-Enhanced Fusion Network for Automatic Multi-Class Sleep Disorder Classification from Polysomnography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automated sleep staging on wearable data could improve our understanding and management of epilepsy. This study evaluated sleep scoring by a deep learning model on 223 night-sleep recordings from 50 patients measured in the hospital with an electroencephalogram (EEG) and a wearable device. The model scored the sleep stage of every 30-s epoch on the EEG and wearable data, and we compared the output with a clinical expert on 20 nights, each for a different patient. The Bland-Altman analysis examined differences in the automated staging in both modalities, and using mixed-effect models, we explored sleep differences between patients with and without seizures. Overall, we found moderate accuracy and Cohen's kappa on the model scoring of standard EEG (0.73 and 0.59) and the wearable (0.61 and 0.43) versus the clinical expert. F1 scores also varied between patients and the modalities. The sensitivity varied by sleep stage and was very low for stage N1. Moreover, sleep staging on the wearable data underestimated the duration of most sleep macrostructure parameters except N2. On the other hand, patients with seizures during the hospital admission slept more each night (6.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.86-7.87) compared with patients without seizures (5.68, 95% CI 5.24-6.13), p = 0.001, but also spent more time in stage N2. In conclusion, wearable EEG and accelerometry could monitor sleep in patients with epilepsy, and our approach can help automate the analysis. However, further steps are essential to improve the model performance before clinical implementation. Trial Registration: The SeizeIT2 trial was registered in clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04284072.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.