ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2025
Emotions mediate nonlinear phenomena production in the vocalizations of two ape species.
Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges and new opportunities in deciphering the meaning of corvid call sequences.Animal cognition · 2025Review
- Nonlinear phenomena in vertebrate vocalizations: mechanisms and communicative functions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
- How to analyse and manipulate nonlinear phenomena in voice recordings.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- Emotions mediate nonlinear phenomena production in the vocalizations of two ape species.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nonlinear phenomena (NLP) are widely observed in mammal vocalizations. One prominent, albeit rarely empirically tested, theory suggests that NLP serve to communicate individual emotional states. Here, we test this 'emotional hypothesis' by assessing NLP production in the vocalizations of chimpanzees and bonobos across various social contexts. These two species are relevant to test this hypothesis since bonobos are more socially opportunistic than chimpanzees. We found that both species produced, albeit at different frequencies, the same five distinct NLP types. Contextual valence influenced NLP production in both species with negative valence being associated with more frequent NLP production than positive and neutral valence. In contrast, using aggression severity and caller role as proxies for arousal, we found that in bonobos, but not in chimpanzees, vocalizations uttered during contact aggression or from victims and females contained more NLP. In contrast, the type of NLP produced was neither influenced by valence nor arousal in either species. Our study supports the emotional hypothesis regarding the occurrence of NLP production in mammals, particularly in opportunistics such as bonobos. This reinforces the hypothesis of an adaptative role of NLP in animal communication and prompts further investigations into their communicative functions.This article is part of the theme issue 'Nonlinear phenomena in vertebrate vocalizations: mechanisms and communicative functions'.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.