Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40176402›Full record

ArticleKidney research and clinical practice2025

Predictive models for posttransplant diabetes mellitus in kidney transplant recipients using machine learning and deep learning approach: a nationwide cohort study from South Korea.

Seoyoung Choi, Mi Ryung Pyo, Sangwoong Kim, Jong Cheol Jeong, Yu Ho Lee, Hyejin Mo, Jeong-Hoon Lee, Jaeseok Yang, Myoung Soo Kim, Hye Eun Yoon and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Kidney research and clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Seoyoung ChoiDepartment of Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Mi Ryung PyoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sangwoong KimCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Jong Cheol JeongCenter for Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Yu Ho LeeDivision of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Hyejin MoDepartment of Surgery, SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jeong-Hoon LeeDepartment of Surgery, Myongji Hospital, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Jaeseok YangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Myoung Soo KimDepartment of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hye Eun YoonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sejoong KimDepartment of Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare HI19C0481 and HC20C0054Ministry of Health and Welfare HI23C047600National Institute of Health 2014-ER6301-00, 2014-ER6301-01, 2014-ER6301-02, 2017-ER6301-00, 2017-ER6301-01, 2017-ER6301-02, 2020-ER7201-00, 2020-ER7201-01, 2020-ER7201-02, 2023-ER0805-00, and 2023-ER0805-01Patient-Centered Clinical Research Coordinating Center
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPosttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) complicates kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) in morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to predict PTDM risk in KTRs using machine learning and deep learning models.

methodsData were obtained from the Korea Organ Transplantation Registry, a nationwide cohort study of KTRs. Four machine learning algorithms, including eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), CatBoost, light gradient boosting machine and logistic regression, and deep learning were implemented on 41 pretransplant and 31 posttransplant variables to predict PTDM. Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score.

resultsAmong 3,213 KTRs, 497 patients (15.5%) developed PTDM within 1 year. The PTDM group had higher age, body mass index (BMI), triglyceride level, and prevalence of hypertension and cardiovascular disease, and lower total cholesterol level at baseline than the No-PTDM group. The XGBoost model showed the highest AUC (0.738) and F1 score (0.42), and modest accuracy (0.86), while the CatBoost model exhibited the highest accuracy (0.87) and precision (0.79). Feature importance in XGBoost was highest for recipient age, followed by baseline BMI, triglyceride level at posttransplant 6 months, baseline glycated hemoglobin and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, white blood cell (WBC) count and serum uric acid level at 6 months, baseline WBC count, and tacrolimus trough level at discharge.

conclusionThe XGBoost model demonstrated the best performance for predicting PTDM within 1 year, offering an accurate tool for early identification and personalized care of high-risk KTRs for PTDM.

Indexed as

Deep learningDiabetes mellitusKidney transplantationMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID40176402
PMCPMC12611607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.