ArticleCancer medicine2025
Mismatch Repair Status and Lymph Node Ratio in Survival Prediction of Stage II/III Rectal Cancer Patients: A Comprehensive Analysis of a Multi-Center Retrospective Study.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe microsatellite status (dMMR vs. pMMR) in colorectal cancer can serve as a guiding factor for patient prognosis and treatment, where dMMR status indicates a better prognosis and often obviates the need for adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). Conversely, a higher lymph node ratio (LNR) is associated with a poorer prognosis. This study aims to elucidate the prognostic significance of LNR and MMR status in relation to ACT in stages II and III colorectal cancer.
methodsA total of 1946 patients who underwent radical resection for colorectal cancer and were pathologically staged as II and III from three medical centers between 2012 and 2019 were selected. Among them, 1104 patients were included after MMR status was tested and postoperative chemotherapy was administered, along with other clinical information. MMR (mismatch repair) status was determined via pathological immunohistochemistry (IHC), and LNR was calculated. Patients were divided into three groups based on the LNR value and subjected to Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis to assess the impact of MMR, LNR, and ACT on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).
resultsA total of 6.47% of stage II and III colorectal cancers were detected as dMMR. Significant differences in OS and DFS between dMMR and pMMR patients were observed when the LNR ranged from 0.03 to 0.31, with pMMR patients showing a better prognosis. Stratified analysis with ACT revealed that postoperative chemotherapy did not affect the prognosis within the dMMR patient group. However, compared to the pMMR group, dMMR patients experienced significantly adverse effects on prognosis after receiving postoperative chemotherapy (p < 0.05). This result was more pronounced in the stratified analysis based on LNR (0.03-0.31) (p < 0.01).
conclusionsIntegrating LNR based on the microsatellite status of colorectal tumors provides comprehensive prognostic predictions, enhancing postoperative prognostic considerations for tumor patients. Additionally, our study suggests that patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer with dMMR status do not require any adjuvant chemotherapy postoperatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.