Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40176186›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2025

A pilot study on the clinical feasibility of 5G remote robot-assisted gastrectomy.

Mingze Zhang, Ming Hu, Jing Yang, Wutang Jing, Jin Guo, Hui Cai, Yuntao Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Remote Telesurgery Versus Local Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Comparative Evidence Base.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Robotic gastrectomy: Research progress and practical challenges].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mingze ZhangDepartment of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Ming HuDepartment of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Jing YangDepartment of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Wutang JingDepartment of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Jin GuoDepartment of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Hui CaiDepartment of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, China.
Yuntao MaDepartment of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, China. 3575515665@qq.com.

Funding

Gansu Provincial Science and Technology Plan (Joint Scientific Research Fund) Project 24JRRA885Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province funding project 22JR5RA663Research Project of Gansu Provincial Hospital 2024KYQDJ-A-14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeExploring the Clinical Safety and Feasibility of 5G Remote Surgery Robot-Assisted Gastrectomy.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of two patients who underwent 5G remote surgery robot-assisted gastrectomy at the General Surgery Clinical Center of Gansu Provincial Hospital from June to September 2024. One case involved a cross-provincial remote surgery between Gansu Provincial Hospital and Yangzhou University Affiliated Hospital, located over 1700 km apart, classified as the "long-distance patient." The other case involved a remote surgery within the province, between Gansu Provincial Hospital and the Gansu Provincial Hospital (Lanzhou New District Branch), located 70 km apart, classified as the "short-distance patient." General data, intraoperative conditions, network status, postoperative routine information, and postoperative follow-up data were recorded and analyzed for two patients.

resultBoth patients successfully completed the surgery. The master-slave control duration for the long-distance surgery patient and the short-distance surgery patient were 259 min and 308 min, respectively; the total surgical durations were 285 min and 320 min, respectively. Neither patient experienced an intraoperative conversion to traditional surgery. The average total delay for the long-distance surgery patient was 99 ms, and for the short-distance surgery patient, it was 48 ms; the packet loss rates were 0.0188% and 0%, respectively, with no network jitter or interruptions observed. The long-distance surgery patient had a drainage tube retention time of 10 d, a postoperative hospital stay of 14 d. The short-distance surgery patient had a drainage tube retention time of 8 d, a postoperative hospital stay of 10 d. No postoperative complications occurred in either patient.

conclusionThis study suggests that 5G remote surgery is feasible and safe, but larger-scale research is needed.

Indexed as

GastrectomyRobotic Surgical ProceduresStomach NeoplasmsFeasibility StudiesFollow-Up StudiesHumansOperative TimePilot ProjectsPrognosisRetrospective Studies5G communication technologyGastrectomyRemote surgeryRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID40176186
PMCPMC11963447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.