ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2025
Deep learning-based reconstruction and superresolution for MR-guided thermal ablation of malignant liver lesions.
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study evaluates the impact of deep learning-enhanced T1-weighted VIBE sequences (DL-VIBE) on image quality and procedural parameters during MR-guided thermoablation of liver malignancies, compared to standard VIBE (SD-VIBE).
methodsBetween September 2021 and February 2023, 34 patients (mean age: 65.4 years; 13 women) underwent MR-guided microwave ablation on a 1.5 T scanner. Intraprocedural SD-VIBE sequences were retrospectively processed with a deep learning algorithm (DL-VIBE) to reduce noise and enhance sharpness. Two interventional radiologists independently assessed image quality, noise, artifacts, sharpness, diagnostic confidence, and procedural parameters using a 5-point Likert scale. Interrater agreement was analyzed, and noise maps were created to assess signal-to-noise ratio improvements.
resultsDL-VIBE significantly improved image quality, reduced artifacts and noise, and enhanced sharpness of liver contours and portal vein branches compared to SD-VIBE (p < 0.01). Procedural metrics, including needle tip detectability, confidence in needle positioning, and ablation zone assessment, were significantly better with DL-VIBE (p < 0.01). Interrater agreement was high (Cohen κ = 0.86). Reconstruction times for DL-VIBE were 3 s for k-space reconstruction and 1 s for superresolution processing. Simulated acquisition modifications reduced breath-hold duration by approximately 2 s.
conclusionDL-VIBE enhances image quality during MR-guided thermal ablation while improving efficiency through reduced processing and acquisition times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.