Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40176179›Full record

ArticleAdvances in simulation (London, England)2025

Extended reality and computer-based simulation for teaching situational awareness in undergraduate health professions education: a scoping review.

Mehak Chandanani, Anita Laidlaw, Craig Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in simulation (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mehak ChandananiInstitute of Education in Healthcare and Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2702-9404
Anita LaidlawInstitute of Education in Healthcare and Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1214-4100
Craig BrownInstitute of Education in Healthcare and Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. Craig.brown@abdn.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4780-6485

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWith the rapid evolution of healthcare environments, effective and accessible experiential learning has become an integral part of health education. Virtual reality (VR) poses the advantage of providing users with a virtual, immersive experience, to allow them to interact with elements of a simulated environment. This scoping review aims to evaluate the use of virtual reality (VR)-based simulation for the training of situational awareness (SA) and decision-making (DM) for undergraduate healthcare education.

methodsA search was carried out across eight databases, namely: MEDLINE, Embase + Embase Classic, Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed, CINAHL, ERIC, and PsycINFO. Studies evaluating the use of VR and its extended interfaces (i.e., augmented reality (AR) and mixed reality (MR)) for training SA and DM in undergraduate healthcare education were included.

resultsOf 3932 studies retrieved from the database search, 35 studies were included within the review. VR-based interventions were used across a range of healthcare profession trainees, including nursing, medical, paramedical, midwifery, and healthcare assistant students. Seventeen studies used screen-based VR interventions, and 16 studies used head-mounted devices (HMD). One study used both screen-based and HMD interventions and one further augmented reality. Twenty-nine studies assessed the role of the intervention in DM training, and 6 studies assessed its role in SA training. Eighteen studies used validated assessment tools, and 17 studies used educational theories to underpin their learning techniques.

conclusionsThe role of VR in training of SA and DM for healthcare professions has been well recognized, as demonstrated by the increasing number of studies. There is need for consensus of reporting for such studies to ensure a high-quality body of evidence with standardized outcome assessment.

Indexed as

Decision-makingExtended realityScoping reviewSituational awarenessVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID40176179
PMCPMC11963705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.