Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40176175›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

A longitudinal examination of loneliness in left-behind children: the interaction between self-esteem and academic self-efficacy matters.

Yutao Zhou, Chengwen Fan, Shuge Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yutao ZhouCollege of Physical Education, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou, China.
Chengwen FanCollege of Physical Education, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou, China.
Shuge ZhangCollege of Physical Education, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou, China. zhangshuge@hut.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6935-8831

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLoneliness can cause severe mental and physical health problems and is of particular concern among vulnerable groups such as left-behind children. Research has suggested important person-level characteristics and attributes, such as self-esteem and self-efficacy, to be protective factors of loneliness in children. However, existing research is limited in the use of a cross-sectional design and the lack of consideration of the self-esteem × self-efficacy interaction on loneliness, as well as the potential divergent effects of domain-specific (e.g., general vs. academic) self-efficacy in loneliness.

methodsWe used a longitudinal design to examine the moderation role of general vs. academic self-efficacy in the influence of self-esteem on left-behind children's loneliness. In a sample of 405 left-behind children (M

resultsAcademic self-efficacy was a more proximal predictor of loneliness at baseline and its change over time. Importantly, self-esteem predicted lowered loneliness and a more significant reduction over one year only when academic (not general) self-efficacy was high.

conclusionsA profile of high self-esteem and low academic self-efficacy appeared to be the most at-risk for loneliness in left-behind children. The findings should inform future research and policy/intervention efforts regarding strategies for addressing loneliness in left-behind children by enhancing their academic self-efficacy and closing the esteem-efficacy discrepancy.

Indexed as

LonelinessSelf ConceptSelf EfficacyChildFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleDomain-specific self-efficacyPath analysisResidual changeSelf-discrepancy

Identifiers

PMID40176175
PMCPMC11966814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.