ReviewTropical medicine and health2025
Reinvigorating AMR resilience: leveraging CRISPR-Cas technology potentials to combat the 2024 WHO bacterial priority pathogens for enhanced global health security-a systematic review.
Review in Tropical medicine and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- CRISPR-Cas systems as next-generation antimicrobials: a systemic review of mechanisms, delivery strategies, and translational challenges.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- CRISPR-Cas systems in combating antimicrobial resistance: which system to choose? A systematic review.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Pooled it
- Novel Therapeutic Approaches and Alternatives to Antibiotic Therapy for Drug-Resistant Intra-Abdominal Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- CRISPR-based gene editing for antimicrobial resistance control in human medicine.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- The ESKAPE Challenge: Understanding Resistance and Exploring Alternative Treatments.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bovine Mastitis Therapy at a Crossroads: Pharmacokinetic Barriers, Biofilms, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Emerging Solutions.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Synthesis, characterization, andFrontiers in chemistry · 2026Article
- Review
- Beyond the Resistome: Molecular Insights, Emerging Therapies, and Environmental Drivers of Antibiotic Resistance.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Invasomes and Nanostructured Lipid Carriers for Targeted Delivery of Ceftazidime Combined with N-Acetylcysteine: A Novel Approach to TreatPharmaceutics · 2025Article
- The extended mobility of plasmids.Nucleic acids research · 2025Review
- Advances in HIV Treatment and Vaccine Development: Emerging Therapies and Breakthrough Strategies for Long-Term Control.AIDS research and treatment · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a global health threat, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-Cas system technology offers a promising tool to combat AMR by targeting and disabling resistance genes in WHO bacterial priority pathogens. Thus, we systematically reviewed the potential of CRISPR-Cas technology to address AMR.
methodsThis systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the Scopus and PubMed databases, focusing on publications from 2014 to June 2024. Keywords included "CRISPR/Cas," "antimicrobial resistance," and "pathogen." The eligibility criteria required original studies involving CRISPR/Cas systems that targeted AMR. Data were extracted from eligible studies, qualitatively synthesized, and assessed for bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI)-standardized tool.
resultsData from 48 eligible studies revealed diverse CRISPR-Cas systems, including CRISPR-Cas9, CRISPR-Cas12a, and CRISPR-Cas3, targeting various AMR genes, such as blaOXA-232, blaNDM, blaCTX-M, ermB, vanA, mecA, fosA3, blaKPC, and mcr-1, which are responsible for carbapenem, cephalosporin, methicillin, macrolide, vancomycin, colistin, and fosfomycin resistance. Some studies have explored the role of CRISPR in virulence gene suppression, including enterotoxin genes, tsst1, and iutA in Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Delivery mechanisms include bacteriophages, nanoparticles, electro-transformation, and conjugative plasmids, which demonstrate high efficiency in vitro and in vivo. CRISPR-based diagnostic applications have demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, with detection limits as low as 2.7 × 10
conclusionsCRISPR-Cas technology has the potential to address AMR across priority WHO pathogens. While promising, challenges in optimizing in vivo delivery, mitigating potential resistance, and navigating ethical-regulatory barriers must be addressed to facilitate clinical translation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.