Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40176122›Full record

Trial reportAlzheimer's research & therapy2025

Effects of 52 weeks of precuneus rTMS in Alzheimer's disease patients: a randomized trial.

Giacomo Koch, Elias Paolo Casula, Sonia Bonnì, Ilaria Borghi, Martina Assogna, Francesco Di Lorenzo, Romina Esposito, Michele Maiella, Alessia D'Acunto, Matteo Ferraresi and 6 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03778151 nacompletednot on this map

Repetitive TMS of the Precuneus: a Randomized Double-blinded Placebo-controlled Trial in Alzheimer's Disease Patients.

TypeinterventionalSponsorI.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa LuciaRan2018 to 2020Enrolled50ConditionsAlzheimer DiseaseArmsREPETITIVE TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION
NCT05454540 nacompletednot on this map

A Randomized Double-blinded Sham-controlled Trial of Precuneus RTMS in Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease Patients.

TypeinterventionalSponsorI.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa LuciaRan2018 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsAlzheimer DiseaseArmsREPETITIVE TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Clinical utility and prospective of TMS-EEG: Updated review from an international expert group.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  10. A meta-analysis of the effect of non-invasive neuromodulation techniques on improving cognitive function in patients with Alzheimer's disease.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Giacomo KochDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Via Ardeatina, 306, 00179, Rome, Italy. g.koch@hsantalucia.it.
Elias Paolo CasulaDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Via Ardeatina, 306, 00179, Rome, Italy.
Sonia BonnìDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Via Ardeatina, 306, 00179, Rome, Italy.
Ilaria BorghiDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Via Ardeatina, 306, 00179, Rome, Italy.
Martina AssognaDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Via Ardeatina, 306, 00179, Rome, Italy.
Francesco Di LorenzoDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Via Ardeatina, 306, 00179, Rome, Italy.
Romina EspositoDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Via Ardeatina, 306, 00179, Rome, Italy.
Michele MaiellaDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Via Ardeatina, 306, 00179, Rome, Italy.
Alessia D'AcuntoDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Via Ardeatina, 306, 00179, Rome, Italy.
Matteo FerraresiDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Via Ardeatina, 306, 00179, Rome, Italy.
Lucia MencarelliDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Via Ardeatina, 306, 00179, Rome, Italy.
Valentina PezzopaneDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Via Ardeatina, 306, 00179, Rome, Italy.
Caterina MottaDepartment of Systems Medicine, University of Tor Vergata, 00133, Rome, Italy.
Emiliano SantarnecchiPrecision Neuroscience and Neuromodulation Program, Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Massachussets General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Marco BozzaliDepartment of Neuroscience Rita Levi Montalcini, University of Torino, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Alessandro MartoranaDepartment of Clinical and Behavioural Neurology, Santa Lucia Foundation IRCCS, Via Ardeatina, 306, 00179, Rome, Italy.

Funding

BrightFocus Foundation A2019523SMinistero della Salute 2016-02364718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersonalized repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the precuneus (PC) is emerging as a new non-invasive therapeutic approach in treating Alzheimer's disease (AD). Here we sought to investigate the effects of 52 weeks of rTMS applied over the PC on cognitive functions in patients with mild-to-moderate dementia due to AD.

methodsForty-eight patients with mild-to-moderate dementia due to AD were enrolled for the study. Of those 31 patients were extended to 52 weeks after being included in a 24-week trial (NCT03778151) with the same experimental design. The trial included a 52-week treatment with a 2-week intensive course where rTMS (or sham) was applied over the PC daily (5 times per week, Monday to Friday), followed by a 50-week maintenance phase in which the same stimulation was applied once weekly. Personalization of rTMS treatment was established using neuronavigated TMS in combination with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG). The primary outcome measure was change from baseline to week 52 of the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB). Secondary outcomes included score changes in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale- Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog)

resultsAmong 48 patients randomized (mean age 72.8 years; 56% women), 32 (68%) completed the study. Repetitive TMS of the PC (PC-rTMS) had a significant effect on the primary outcome measure. The estimated mean change in CDR-SB after 52 week was 1.36 for PC-rTMS (95% confidence interval (CI) [0.68, 2.04]) and 2.45 for sham-rTMS group (95%CI [1.85, 3.05]). There were also significant effects for the secondary outcomes ADAS-Cog

conclusionsFifty-two weeks of PC-rTMS may slow down the impairment of cognitive functions, activities of daily living and behavioral disturbances in patients with mild-to-moderate AD. Further multicenter studies are needed to confirm the clinical potential of DMN personalized rTMS.

trial registrationThe study was registered on the clinicaltrial.gov website on 07-07-2022 (NCT05454540).

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseParietal LobeTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAgedAged, 80 and overElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsTreatment OutcomeAlzheimer’s diseaseDefault mode networkPrecuneusrTMS

Identifiers

PMID40176122
PMCPMC11963669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.