Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40176116›Full record

ReviewJournal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England)2025

Risk assessment and management of chemical hazards for pregnant workers: a qualitative review of guidance from EU member states.

Thomas Claessens, Karin Sørig Hougaard, Steven Ronsmans

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas ClaessensDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Environment and Health, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. thomas.claessens@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-8753-5812
Karin Sørig HougaardNational Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3386-0512
Steven RonsmansDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Environment and Health, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6767-2691

Funding

Danish Government FFIKA 2KU Leuven STG/23/043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExposure to workplace chemicals can pose serious risks to reproductive health. The European Union's Pregnant Workers Directive requires risk assessments but lacks clear guidelines for assessing chemical reproductive hazards in workplaces.

aimsThis study aims to review how EU member states implement the Pregnant Workers Directive by analysing national guidance documents and relevant literature.

methodsA qualitative review was conducted, combining a systematic literature search with outreach to EU national experts to gather relevant guidance documents. Thematic synthesis identified guiding principles for implementing maternity protection for chemical exposures.

resultsTwo main themes were identified: the need for a broad perspective and for certainty in risk assessment. The broad perspective stresses the importance of considering all reproductive hazards, not limited to those listed in the EU Directive and inclusion of male workers and the preconception period, and the potential adverse socio-economic consequences of applied protective measures. The need for certainty highlights the challenges in reliable risk assessments, due to lack of knowledge about chemicals' hazardous properties, dose-response relationships and the level of worker exposure. These themes reveal the complexity of implementing effective maternity protection and the need for improved guidelines across the EU.

conclusionsThis study calls for a unified approach to reproductive health protection, extending beyond pregnancy to include also preconception and paternal exposures. The findings highlight the need to support practitioners in the risk assess process at workplaces in the EU by providing a framework for the assessment of reproductive hazards and determining protective measures.

Identifiers

PMID40176116
PMCPMC11963499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.