ArticleCardiovascular diabetology2025
Relationship between hemoglobin glycation index and myocardial mechano-energetic efficiency in non-diabetic individual.
Article in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Association between glycated hemoglobin variability and risk of diabetic kidney disease and diabetic retinopathy in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Analysis of the Relationship Between Glycated Hemoglobin and Echocardiographic Parameters in Patients Without Diabetes: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- A two-strata energy flux system driven by a stress hormone prioritizes cardiac energetics.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Article
- The Association Between the Hemoglobin Glycation Index and Cardiometabolic Diseases: A Mini-Review.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThe hemoglobin glycation index (HGI) has been linked to cardiovascular disease in diabetic patients. However, it remains unclear whether an elevated HGI similarly affects the cardiovascular system in individuals with normal glucose tolerance or prediabetes. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to determine whether increased HGI levels are associated with a reduction in myocardial mechano-energetic efficiency (MEE), a key predictor of cardiovascular events and heart failure, in non-diabetic subjects.
methodsMyocardial MEE per gram of left ventricular mass (MEEi) was assessed via echocardiography in a cohort of 1,074 adults with different glucose tolerance statuses, enrolled in the CATAnzaro MEtabolic RIsk factors (CATAMERI) study. HGI was defined as the difference between the measured HbA1c and the predicted HbA1c, the latter calculated from the linear association between HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose levels.
resultsSubjects in the highest HGI quartile exhibited significantly elevated myocardial oxygen consumption and a marked reduction in MEEi compared to those in the lowest quartile. A significant inverse correlation was observed between HGI and MEEi (r = - 0.210, P < 0.001). A multivariate linear regression analysis confirmed the strong relationship between higher HGI levels and lower MEEi, even after adjusting for several potential confounders, including sex, age, body mass index, waist circumference, smoking status, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, 2-hour post-load glucose, glucose tolerance status, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, hs-CRP, antihypertensive therapy, and lipid-lowering therapy.
conclusionsThese findings support the hypothesis that higher HGI values may affect myocardial mechano-energetic efficiency in non-diabetic individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.