ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
The learning curve for lumbar discectomy in unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery using the cumulative summation method.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unilateral biportal endoscopic partial cervical laminectomy and facetectomy: An ex vivo study and case report.Veterinary surgery : VS · 2026Article
- The learning curve of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy versus unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a comparative study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUnilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) is gaining popularity owing to its versatility as a spinal endoscopic procedure. However, the general value of the learning curve for discectomy by UBE is unknown. This retrospective study aimed to determine the learning curve of UBE for lumbar discectomy using a cumulative summation (CUSUM) method. We examined the learning curves of four surgeons at an institution and factors that shortened the learning curves.
methodsThe study included 200 patients (mean age 44.2 years) who underwent lumbar discectomy by UBE at our hospital and four male orthopedic surgeons who had performed 50 UBE discectomies. An approximate curve using the CUSUM method was created using the mean operative time for each case as the target. All surgeons had performed lumbar discectomy and over 200 spinal surgeries before inducing UBE. Surgeon A received specialized training in shoulder arthroscopic surgery. The surgical times before and after the curve reached its maximum value were compared; a point of significant difference was defined as case to proficiency.
resultsThe mean operative times for surgeons A, B, C, and D were 48, 66, 90, and 87 min, respectively. The approximate curves obtained using the CUSUM method had maxima at x = 22, 20, 27, and 13. The operating times of Surgeons A and B showed significant differences before and after the maxima (59 vs. 39 and 75 vs. 60), whereas those of Surgeons C and D did not (96 vs. 84 and 95 vs. 85).
conclusionsUBE is generally considered to have a steep learning curve; in this study, the learning curve differed depending on the surgeon. The surgeon with the best learning curve was trained as an arthroscopic surgeon. Coordination for endoscopic surgery influenced the learning curve compared to the experience with spine surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.