Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40176063›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025

The learning curve for lumbar discectomy in unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery using the cumulative summation method.

Takaki Yoshimizu, Sanshiro Saito, Teruaki Miyake, Tetsutaro Mizuno, Ushio Nosaka, Keisuke Ishii, Mizuki Watanabe, Kanji Sasaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Takaki Yoshimizu *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12, Sumiyoshi, Chuou-ward, Hamamatsu, 430-8558, Shizuoka, Japan. yossy8772@gmail.com.
Sanshiro SaitoDepartment of Spine and Bone Tumor, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12, Sumiyoshi, Chuou-ward, Hamamatsu, 430-8558, Shizuoka, Japan.
Teruaki MiyakeDepartment of Spine and Bone Tumor, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12, Sumiyoshi, Chuou-ward, Hamamatsu, 430-8558, Shizuoka, Japan.
Tetsutaro MizunoDepartment of Spine and Bone Tumor, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12, Sumiyoshi, Chuou-ward, Hamamatsu, 430-8558, Shizuoka, Japan.
Ushio NosakaDepartment of Spine and Bone Tumor, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12, Sumiyoshi, Chuou-ward, Hamamatsu, 430-8558, Shizuoka, Japan.
Keisuke IshiiDepartment of Spine and Bone Tumor, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12, Sumiyoshi, Chuou-ward, Hamamatsu, 430-8558, Shizuoka, Japan.
Mizuki WatanabeDepartment of Spine and Bone Tumor, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12, Sumiyoshi, Chuou-ward, Hamamatsu, 430-8558, Shizuoka, Japan.
Kanji Sasaki *Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, 2-12-12, Sumiyoshi, Chuou-ward, Hamamatsu, 430-8558, Shizuoka, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) is gaining popularity owing to its versatility as a spinal endoscopic procedure. However, the general value of the learning curve for discectomy by UBE is unknown. This retrospective study aimed to determine the learning curve of UBE for lumbar discectomy using a cumulative summation (CUSUM) method. We examined the learning curves of four surgeons at an institution and factors that shortened the learning curves.

methodsThe study included 200 patients (mean age 44.2 years) who underwent lumbar discectomy by UBE at our hospital and four male orthopedic surgeons who had performed 50 UBE discectomies. An approximate curve using the CUSUM method was created using the mean operative time for each case as the target. All surgeons had performed lumbar discectomy and over 200 spinal surgeries before inducing UBE. Surgeon A received specialized training in shoulder arthroscopic surgery. The surgical times before and after the curve reached its maximum value were compared; a point of significant difference was defined as case to proficiency.

resultsThe mean operative times for surgeons A, B, C, and D were 48, 66, 90, and 87 min, respectively. The approximate curves obtained using the CUSUM method had maxima at x = 22, 20, 27, and 13. The operating times of Surgeons A and B showed significant differences before and after the maxima (59 vs. 39 and 75 vs. 60), whereas those of Surgeons C and D did not (96 vs. 84 and 95 vs. 85).

conclusionsUBE is generally considered to have a steep learning curve; in this study, the learning curve differed depending on the surgeon. The surgeon with the best learning curve was trained as an arthroscopic surgeon. Coordination for endoscopic surgery influenced the learning curve compared to the experience with spine surgery.

Indexed as

DiskectomyEndoscopyLearning CurveLumbar VertebraeAdultClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultBiportal endoscopic spine surgeryCumulative sum analysisInterlaminar approachLearning curveLumbar discectomyOrthopedicRetrospective studySpecialized trainingSurgeonUnilateral biportal endoscopy

Identifiers

PMID40176063
PMCPMC11963341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.