Observational studyBMC health services research2025
Implementing Learning from Excellence in a postanaesthesia care unit: a qualitative study of healthcare professionals' experiences after six months.
Observational study in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05794490 (Continuous Learning to Increase Patient Safety - A Multi-method Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Continuous Learning to Increase Patient Safety - A Multi-method Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- No effect of learning from excellence on patient safety culture in a postanaesthesia care unit: a longitudinal quasi-experimental study.BMC health services research · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevailing efforts to ensure patient safety have primarily focused on learning from errors and adverse events (Safety-I). However, it is advocated that complex systems also learn from success (Safety-II) and focus on healthcare professionals' well-being at work to increase resilience. Learning from Excellence is a British initiative designed to learn from successful practices and provide positive feedback to the staff. It has gained enthusiastic followers in several countries, including Norway. However, how it influences learning, well-being and quality improvement, has not been studied in-depth. This study intends to address these gaps. Thus, this study aimed to describe healthcare professionals' experiences with Learning from Excellence six months after its implementation in a postanaesthesia care unit.
methodsA qualitative descriptive design was applied. Learning from Excellence was implemented in a postanaesthesia care unit of a Norwegian university hospital between November 2022 and May 2023. Six semi-structured focus group interviews were conducted, from May to June 2023, with a convenience sample of nurses (n = 17) and physicians (n = 7). The data were analysed through inductive reflexive thematic analysis. The study adhered to the COREQ guidelines.
resultsThis study reports four prominent themes encapsulating healthcare professionals' experiences with Learning from Excellence. These themes were termed as follows: 1) 'Facilitates a more positive working climate', including sub-themes 'Helps spread positive feedback' and 'Feeling seen and motivated'; 2) 'Why don't I get any 'likes'?'; 3) 'Organisational learning is challenging', including sub-themes 'Hesitating to report' and 'Provides mostly superficial learning'; and 4) 'Success inspires quality improvement project'.
conclusionsImplementing LfE mostly contributed to a positive working climate in a postanaesthesia care unit. For LfE to be worth implementing, it is essential to improve organisational learning, while minimising the negative effects of LfE, such as exclusivity issues.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05794490; first registered on March 4, 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.