ArticleBMC cancer2025
Developing a novel predictive model for identifying risk factors associated with being lost to follow-up among high-risk patients for recurrence following radical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: the first report.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Multi-Gene Signature Associated with 1-Year Survival in Patients with Stage I Liver Cancer: Integration of Preclinical and TCGA Data.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFollow-up is essential especially for patients who are at a high risk of recurrence after radical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model aimed at identifying the risk factors associated with being lost to follow-up (LTFU) in high-risk patients for recurrence following radical resection of HCC.
methodsThe retrospective study was conducted at our institution between October 2018 to May 2023. The patients who underwent radical liver resection for HCC and had high-risk factors for recurrence were categorized into an LTFU group and a control group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was utilized to determine risk factors and construct a nomogram predictive model.
resultsA total of 352 patients were included and subsequently classified into two distinct groups: the LTFU group (n = 123, 34.94%) and the control group (n = 229, 65.06%). Logistic regression analysis was then conducted to explore the potential associations between various factors and the occurrence of LTFU. The findings identified several independent risk factors for LTFU, including smoking (odds ratio, OR = 1.823, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.086-3.060, p = 0.023); residing more than 200 km away from the hospital (OR = 1.857, 95% CI 1.105-3.121, p = 0.019); having an unstable profession (OR = 1.918, 95% CI 1.112-3.311, p = 0.019); and lacking medical insurance (OR = 5.921, 95% CI 1.747-20.071, p = 0.004); the presence of liver cirrhosis (OR = 2.161, 95% CI 1.153-4.048, p = 0.016); an operation time less than 240 min (OR = 2.138, 95% CI 1.240-3.688, p = 0.006); and the absence of postoperative adjuvant therapy (OR = 2.641, 95% CI 1.504-4.637, p = 0.001). Based on these seven significant factors, a main effects model was established, designated as the Wei-LTFU model, which achieved an area under the curve value of 0.744 (95% CI 0.691-0.798) in predicting the likelihood of LTFU.
conclusionA main effects model, namely the Wei-LTFU model, incorporating the seven significant factors was formulated to predict the likelihood of LTFU occurrence, ultimately aiming to assist healthcare workers in developing effective strategies to improve follow-up outcomes for patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.